ASA
Price
$63.29
Change
+$0.98 (+1.57%)
Updated
Aug 21, 02:11 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.33B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SIL
Price
$99.52
Change
+$2.05 (+2.10%)
Updated
Aug 21, 12:26 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
5.2B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASA vs SIL

ASA vs SIL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) vs. Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL)

Key Takeaways

  • ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) is a closed-end fund (CEF) with a broad mandate for precious metals and mining investments, including gold, silver, and related assets, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) is a passive exchange-traded fund (ETF) focused exclusively on silver mining companies.
  • ASA maintains approximately 111 holdings with an expense ratio of 1.88%, offering diversified exposure across precious metals sectors, whereas SIL holds 39–43 securities with a lower expense ratio of 0.65% and concentrates on silver-specific miners.
  • Both vehicles provide thematic exposure to precious metals, but SIL delivers targeted silver mining equity exposure with higher concentration in top holdings such as Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM), Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS), and Coeur Mining Inc. (CDE).
  • ASA operates under a fundamental policy requiring at least 80% of assets in precious metals-related securities or bullion, while SIL tracks a market-capitalization-weighted index of global silver mining firms.
  • Structural differences include ASA’s closed-end format, which can trade at a discount or premium to net asset value (NAV), versus SIL’s open-end ETF structure that typically tracks its index more closely with greater intraday liquidity.
  • Investors seeking lower costs and silver-specific equity beta may prefer SIL, while those desiring broader precious metals diversification through a CEF structure may consider ASA.

Introduction

Precious metals mining equities offer investors a leveraged way to participate in gold and silver price movements driven by inflation hedging, monetary policy shifts, and industrial demand. ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) both target this space but employ distinct structures and focus areas. They do not compete directly; rather, they provide complementary or alternative exposure within the precious metals sector, allowing investors to select based on preferences for diversification breadth, cost efficiency, or silver-specific thematic positioning.

ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) Overview

ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) is a closed-end fund (CEF) that invests primarily in companies engaged in the exploration, mining, or processing of gold, silver, platinum, diamonds, and other precious minerals, along with direct bullion holdings. The fund follows a policy requiring at least 80% of total assets in such precious metals-related investments. It holds approximately 111 securities with an expense ratio of 1.88%. Top holdings typically include major precious metals producers, though concentration varies with market conditions. The fund features an annual portfolio turnover of around 30% and operates as an actively managed vehicle with a fundamental investment approach rather than strict index tracking.

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) Overview

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) is a passive exchange-traded fund (ETF) designed to track the performance of the Solactive Global Silver Miners Index, which comprises companies actively involved in silver mining, exploration, and refining. The fund maintains 39–43 holdings, with an expense ratio of 0.65%. Assets are allocated nearly entirely (approximately 99%) to the basic materials sector. Top holdings include Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM), Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS), Coeur Mining Inc. (CDE), Industrias Peñoles SAB de CV, and Hecla Mining Company (HL), with the top 10 positions often accounting for over 70% of assets. SIL employs market-capitalization weighting and periodic rebalancing consistent with its underlying index methodology.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The precious metals mining sector benefits from ongoing demand for gold as a store of value amid macroeconomic uncertainty and silver’s dual role in monetary and industrial applications, particularly in solar energy, electronics, and electric vehicles. Capital flows into the space often accelerate during periods of elevated inflation expectations, geopolitical tensions, or declining real yields. Regulatory developments around mining permits and environmental standards, along with commodity price volatility, represent key risks. Silver miners specifically face additional sensitivity to industrial cycles compared with broader precious metals funds.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, silver-focused equities have exhibited higher volatility than broader precious metals portfolios due to silver’s greater industrial demand component and smaller market size relative to gold. SIL’s concentrated holdings in leading silver producers can amplify returns during silver price rallies driven by supply constraints or green energy demand, while also increasing drawdowns in downturns. ASA’s wider mandate across gold and other precious metals provides a more diversified risk profile within the sector, potentially offering steadier performance during rotations between gold and silver. Relative positioning favors SIL for investors seeking pure silver beta and ASA for those preferring multi-metal exposure with a closed-end fund (CEF) discount/premium dynamic.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing funds like ASA and SIL can leverage this resource to refine their analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would currently favor Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) on a probabilistic basis due to its lower expense ratio, passive index-tracking efficiency, and targeted silver mining exposure amid favorable sector momentum. The ETF’s structural advantages in cost and liquidity, combined with a concentrated yet rules-based portfolio, position it favorably for investors seeking silver-specific thematic participation compared with ASA’s higher-cost closed-end fund (CEF) format and broader precious metals mandate.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ASA vs. SIL commentary
Aug 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASA is a Hold and SIL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SIL has more net assets: 5.2B vs. ASA (1.33B). SIL has a higher annual dividend yield than ASA: SIL (14.945) vs ASA (4.389). ASA was incepted earlier than SIL: ASA (68 years) vs SIL (16 years). ASA has a higher turnover SIL (27.57) vs SIL (27.57).
ASASILASA / SIL
Gain YTD4.38914.94529%
Net Assets1.33B5.2B26%
Total Expense RatioN/A0.65-
Turnover30.0027.57109%
Yield0.121.388%
Fund Existence68 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASASIL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SIL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RIET9.520.13
+1.38%
Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF
PSET80.490.17
+0.21%
Principal Quality ETF
BUFD30.290.06
+0.18%
FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF
GRNJ30.48-0.16
-0.52%
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small & Mid Cap ETF
AMDY42.66-1.57
-3.54%
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF

SIL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIL has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SIL jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIL
1D Price
Change %
SIL100%
+9.53%
PAAS - SIL
95%
Closely correlated
+7.94%
WPM - SIL
94%
Closely correlated
+11.10%
CDE - SIL
91%
Closely correlated
+13.07%
OR - SIL
89%
Closely correlated
+8.02%
VZLA - SIL
82%
Closely correlated
+8.96%
More