ASA
Price
$60.83
Change
+$0.56 (+0.93%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
1.46B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SIL
Price
$96.36
Change
+$0.16 (+0.17%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
5.12B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASA vs SIL

ASA vs SIL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) vs. Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL)

Key Takeaways

  • ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) is a closed-end fund (CEF) with a long history of active management focused on precious metals mining companies, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) is a passive exchange-traded fund (ETF) tracking a silver mining index.
  • ASA typically maintains approximately 80-90 holdings with broader precious metals exposure including gold, whereas SIL holds around 40 securities concentrated in silver mining firms.
  • Structural differences include ASA's closed-end fund format, which can trade at discounts or premiums to net asset value (NAV), versus SIL's open-end ETF structure offering intraday liquidity.
  • Expense ratios differ notably, with ASA featuring a higher total expense structure near 1.0% or more compared to SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.
  • Thematic positioning varies: ASA emphasizes gold and diversified precious metals, while SIL provides targeted exposure to silver producers and related activities.
  • Both funds respond to commodity price trends and mining sector dynamics, but SIL's lower cost and standard ETF mechanics may appeal to investors seeking efficient silver sector access.

Introduction

ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) offer investors distinct pathways to precious metals exposure through mining equities. These funds do not compete directly but provide alternative strategies within the precious metals sector, with ASA delivering active, diversified precious metals coverage and SIL offering passive, silver-focused equity exposure. Investors comparing them often evaluate structural efficiency, cost, and thematic alignment amid fluctuating commodity markets and mining industry cycles.

ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) Overview

ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) operates as a closed-end fund (CEF) with an investment objective of long-term capital appreciation through holdings in companies engaged in the exploration, mining, or processing of gold, silver, platinum, and other precious minerals. The fund typically holds 80-90 securities and employs bottom-up fundamental analysis for security selection. Top holdings often include major gold and precious metals producers, with allocations spanning gold-dominant and diversified mining firms. Sector exposure centers on basic materials, particularly precious metals mining. The expense structure includes a management fee around 0.52% with total expenses higher, reflecting its active management approach. Distinguishing features include its closed-end structure, which can result in trading at discounts or premiums to net asset value (NAV), and a focus on fundamental research rather than index replication.

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) Overview

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) is a passive exchange-traded fund (ETF) that seeks to track the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. The fund holds approximately 40 securities, with top holdings typically including Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), Pan American Silver (PAAS), and Coeur Mining (CDE). Sector allocation concentrates heavily in basic materials, specifically silver mining and related activities. The expense ratio stands at 0.65%. As a standard open-end ETF, it features daily liquidity, transparent holdings, and physical replication of the underlying index. Key characteristics include semi-annual distributions and a non-diversified structure focused exclusively on the silver mining industry.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The precious metals mining sector encompasses gold and silver producers that respond to commodity price movements, industrial demand, and macroeconomic factors. Silver benefits from both monetary and industrial uses, including solar energy, electronics, and electric vehicles, creating distinct demand drivers compared to gold's primary role as a store of value. Capital flows into mining equities often correlate with metal price trends, interest rate expectations, and supply constraints. Regulatory developments around mining operations and geopolitical factors influencing supply chains represent ongoing considerations. Both funds operate within this environment, where sector rotation and commodity cycles influence relative performance.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, performance differences between the two have reflected their distinct exposures and structures. Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has shown sensitivity to silver price movements and industrial demand shifts, with volatility tied to mining company earnings. ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA), with its broader precious metals focus and active management, has demonstrated positioning influenced by gold price dynamics and fundamental stock selection. Relative volatility tends to be higher for concentrated silver miners during commodity swings, while the closed-end fund structure of ASA introduces additional NAV discount or premium effects. Investors often assess these funds for their roles in sector rotation strategies and commodity trend exposure.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as lower expense ratio, standard ETF liquidity profile, focused silver sector positioning, and efficient index tracking, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorability to Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) over ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA).

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ASA vs. SIL commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASA is a StrongBuy and SIL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SIL has more net assets: 5.12B vs. ASA (1.46B). SIL has a higher annual dividend yield than ASA: SIL (15.533) vs ASA (2.008). ASA was incepted earlier than SIL: ASA (68 years) vs SIL (16 years). ASA has a higher turnover SIL (27.57) vs SIL (27.57).
ASASILASA / SIL
Gain YTD2.00815.53313%
Net Assets1.46B5.12B29%
Total Expense RatioN/A0.65-
Turnover30.0027.57109%
Yield0.091.049%
Fund Existence68 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASASIL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
ASA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SIL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TETH12.670.38
+3.09%
21shares Ethereum Staking ETF
AGEM50.010.66
+1.35%
abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Act ETF
SHNY9.310.10
+1.09%
MicroSectors™ Gold 3X Leveraged ETN
EPI42.290.29
+0.69%
WisdomTree India Earnings ETF
RGTX13.21N/A
N/A
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF

ASA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASA and EMR have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASA and EMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASA
1D Price
Change %
ASA100%
+0.93%
EMR - ASA
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
SSRM - ASA
-4%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
AGI - ASA
-4%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
ORLA - ASA
-6%
Poorly correlated
N/A

SIL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIL has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SIL jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIL
1D Price
Change %
SIL100%
+0.17%
PAAS - SIL
95%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
WPM - SIL
94%
Closely correlated
+2.08%
CDE - SIL
91%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
OR - SIL
89%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
VZLA - SIL
82%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
More