This stock comparison examines ASB and WBS, two regional bank holding companies navigating a dynamic interest rate environment and economic shifts. Investors seeking exposure to the financial sector—particularly those balancing value, income, and growth—may find value in understanding their relative performance. Recent earnings seasons have highlighted resilience in net interest income (NII, revenue from loans minus deposit costs) and credit quality, influencing trader sentiment amid broader market volatility. This analysis draws on key metrics and market positioning to aid informed decision-making in stock comparisons.
Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) is a Wisconsin-based bank holding company with approximately $50 billion in assets, offering banking and nonbanking services across the Midwest. In recent market activity, ASB shares have traded around $27.35, within a 52-week range of $21.62 to $29.52, reflecting a market cap of $5.15 billion. Q1 2026 results showed net income available to common equity of $117 million, or $0.70 diluted earnings per share (EPS), beating expectations due to rising revenues and lower loan loss provisions. Quarterly revenue grew 12.2% year-over-year (yoy), with EPS growth at 17.7%. This performance drove shares up over 10% in recent weeks, supported by a return on equity (ROE) of 10.18% and analyst upgrades to price targets near $31. Sentiment has shifted positively on improved net interest margins and stable deposits, though sensitivity to rate changes persists.
Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) serves as the holding company for Webster Bank, providing commercial banking, consumer services, and specialty finance primarily in the Northeast. Shares recently hovered at $71.81, with a 52-week range of $45.94 to $74.00 and a market cap of $11.64 billion. Q1 results exceeded revenue forecasts, fueled by 15.9% yoy quarterly revenue growth and 43.9% EPS expansion, alongside robust credit performance. YTD returns stand at 14.72%, with shares up about 6% in recent weeks. Key metrics include ROE of 10.77%, ROA of 1.23%, and a price target average of $73.75, though some downgrades cite valuation concerns. Positive sentiment stems from deposit growth and NII resilience, tempered by higher beta exposure to market swings.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available models that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—such as trend following, multi-agent systems, and sector-specific plays—with performance stats including annualized returns ranging from 15% to over 167%, win rates of 48% to 88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 20 in select cases. Timeframes vary from 15 minutes to 55 days, targeting tickers in tech, energy, defense, and finance like NVDA or GS, but none currently feature ASB or WBS. Traders can copy these bots to leverage data-driven signals suited to prevailing conditions. Explore the page to identify bots aligning with your style.
Both ASB and WBS operate similar business models as regional banks focused on commercial lending, deposits, and wealth management, with exposure to interest rate cycles and regional economies. WBS differentiates through greater scale—over twice ASB's market cap and revenue—and faster growth drivers like healthcare finance and Northeast expansion. Recent momentum favors ASB slightly in short-term gains, but WBS leads YTD and in earnings acceleration. Valuation trade-offs highlight ASB's cheaper P/E (9.5 vs. 12.2), higher yield, and lower beta for defensive positioning, versus WBS's premium on ROE parity but superior revenue trajectory. Risk factors include non-performing loans (NCOs, net charge-offs) and deposit competition, with WBS showing stronger credit metrics amid market sentiment tilting toward larger peers.
Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor WBS in the current environment, given its larger scale, higher revenue and EPS growth rates, and stronger YTD relative performance. While ASB offers attractive value and stability, WBS's trend consistency and growth catalysts position it better for potential outperformance, though sector headwinds could narrow the gap probabilistically.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ASB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.55% price change this week, while WBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.55%.
ASB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
WBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| ASB | WBS | ASB / WBS | |
| Capitalization | 5.65B | 12.3B | 46% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.101 | 22.293 | 72% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.20 | 12.48 | 82% |
| Revenue | 1.52B | 2.92B | 52% |
| Total Cash | 465M | 353M | 132% |
| Total Debt | 4.01B | 5.55B | 72% |
ASB | WBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ASB's Valuation (25) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WBS (61) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ASB’s stock grew somewhat faster than WBS’s over the last 12 months.
ASB's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WBS (47) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ASB’s stock grew similarly to WBS’s over the last 12 months.
WBS's SMR Rating (15) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as ASB (22) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WBS’s stock grew similarly to ASB’s over the last 12 months.
WBS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as ASB (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WBS’s stock grew similarly to ASB’s over the last 12 months.
WBS's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASB (97) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASB’s over the last 12 months.
| ASB | WBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 61% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 48% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASB has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASB jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WBS has been closely correlated with WTFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WBS jumps, then WTFC could also see price increases.