Advertisement
FNB vs WBS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) vs. Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) and Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) are both regional bank holding companies with operations focused on commercial and consumer banking services across multiple U.S. states.
- Over recent weeks, both stocks have shown modest gains amid broader regional banking sector activity, with FNB and WBS exhibiting comparable relative performance to peers.
- F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) has reported revenue growth and expansion initiatives, including new office openings in South Carolina, while maintaining strong capital ratios such as return on average tangible common equity.
- Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) has demonstrated year-to-date returns that outpaced the S&P 500 in certain periods, supported by its established presence in the Northeast and diversified financial services.
- Key contrasts include geographic focus, with F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) having broader Mid-Atlantic and Southeast exposure compared to Webster Financial Corporation (WBS)’s Northeast concentration, influencing sector-specific sentiment and risk profiles.
- Market positioning for both reflects typical regional bank dynamics, including sensitivity to interest rate environments and economic indicators affecting net interest income (NII).
Introduction
This comparison examines F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) and Webster Financial Corporation (WBS), two publicly traded regional banks that offer financial products and services to consumers, businesses, and institutions. Investors and traders interested in the regional banking sector may find this analysis relevant for assessing relative performance, business model differences, and market positioning in the current environment. The review draws on observable data from financial reporting and market activity to highlight trade-offs between the two stocks without favoring either.
F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) Overview and Recent Performance
F.N.B. Corporation (FNB), headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, operates as a diversified financial services company through its primary subsidiary, First National Bank. It provides commercial and consumer banking, wealth management, and insurance services across states including Pennsylvania, Ohio, Maryland, North Carolina, and South Carolina. Recent market activity has reflected steady operational execution, with the company reporting first-quarter 2026 revenue growth of 9.4% year-over-year and an 18.8% increase in diluted earnings per share. Expansion efforts, such as new office openings in South Carolina during June 2026, have contributed to positive sentiment. The stock has participated in broader regional bank movements, with performance influenced by capital management actions including dividend increases and share repurchase authorizations. Overall positioning emphasizes resilience in tangible book value per share growth.
Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) Overview and Recent Performance
Webster Financial Corporation (WBS), based in Stamford, Connecticut, serves as the holding company for Webster Bank, offering a range of deposit, lending, and wealth management products primarily in the Northeast. The company has maintained a focus on commercial banking and consumer services amid ongoing sector dynamics. Recent market activity shows the stock achieving year-to-date returns exceeding the S&P 500 in reported periods, supported by operational scale and market presence. Price behavior has aligned with regional bank trends, with modest gains observed in recent weeks amid favorable sessions for the group. Factors influencing performance include earnings trends and broader economic indicators affecting lending activities. Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) continues to demonstrate competitive positioning through established franchise strength in its core markets.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform, each designed to trade thousands of different tickers. Only the best-performing and most suitable bots for prevailing market conditions are featured in this section, drawing from a wide array of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and statistical profiles. Available bots exhibit varying success rates, drawdown levels, and win ratios, often ranging across diverse parameters to suit different investor preferences. This resource provides traders with transparent data on bot statistics to support informed exploration of automated trading options.
Head-to-Head Comparison
F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) and Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) share similarities as regional banks but differ in geographic reach and scale. F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) maintains a wider footprint across the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast, potentially offering greater diversification in deposit and lending markets compared to Webster Financial Corporation (WBS)’s more concentrated Northeast operations. Growth drivers for F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) include recent branch expansions and capital deployment initiatives, while Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) benefits from established market share and reported outperformance relative to broader indices in recent periods. Recent momentum has been comparable, with both stocks reflecting sector-wide influences such as interest rate sensitivity and economic conditions impacting net interest income (NII). Risk factors include typical banking exposures to credit quality and regulatory environments, with trade-offs evident in market capitalization differences and valuation multiples. Sentiment for each remains tied to earnings consistency and macroeconomic positioning rather than isolated catalysts.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent market activity, earnings stability, and relative positioning within the regional banking sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) due to its demonstrated resilience in broader index outperformance and established operational metrics. This assessment reflects data-driven patterns rather than certainty, with F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) remaining competitive on expansion and capital metrics. Outcomes depend on evolving market conditions and sector developments.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNB is a Hold and WBS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FNB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FNB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- WBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FNB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WBS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FNB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- WBS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FNB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while WBS (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
FNB is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.
WBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| FNB | WBS | FNB / WBS | |
| Capitalization | 6.74B | 12.3B | 55% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.325 | 22.437 | 55% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.69 | 12.50 | 94% |
| Revenue | 1.8B | 2.92B | 62% |
| Total Cash | 452M | 353M | 128% |
| Total Debt | 3.14B | 5.55B | 56% |
FNB | WBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 45 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FNB's Valuation (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WBS (57) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to WBS’s over the last 12 months.
FNB's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WBS (45) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to WBS’s over the last 12 months.
WBS's SMR Rating (15) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (21) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WBS’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.
WBS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WBS’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.
WBS's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WBS’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.
| FNB | WBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 56% | 6 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 48% |
Advertisement
FNB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNB has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNB jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNB | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| ASB - FNB | 91% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| ONB - FNB | 90% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| ZION - FNB | 90% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| WTFC - FNB | 89% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| HWC - FNB | 87% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
More | ||||
WBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WBS has been closely correlated with WTFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WBS jumps, then WTFC could also see price increases.