ASC
Price
$9.96
Change
-$0.28 (-2.74%)
Updated
Jul 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
404.21M
21 days until earnings call
SFL
Price
$8.90
Change
-$0.18 (-1.98%)
Updated
Jul 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.21B
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASC vs SFL

Header iconASC vs SFL Comparison
Open Charts ASC vs SFLBanner chart's image
ARDMORE SHIPPING
Price$9.96
Change-$0.28 (-2.74%)
Volume$3.27K
Capitalization404.21M
SFL
Price$8.90
Change-$0.18 (-1.98%)
Volume$3.75K
Capitalization1.21B
ASC vs SFL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASC vs. SFL commentary
Jul 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASC is a StrongBuy and SFL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 16, 2025
Stock price -- (ASC: $10.23 vs. SFL: $9.08)
Brand notoriety: ASC and SFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASC: 110% vs. SFL: 67%
Market capitalization -- ASC: $404.21M vs. SFL: $1.19B
ASC [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $404.21M. SFL’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ASC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ASC and SFL are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFL is a better buy in the short-term than ASC.

Price Growth

ASC (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -1.63% price change this week, while SFL (@Marine Shipping) price change was +1.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASC is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

SFL is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+0.54% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFL($1.21B) has a higher market cap than ASC($404M). SFL has higher P/E ratio than ASC: SFL (22.15) vs ASC (3.16). SFL YTD gains are higher at: -5.383 vs. ASC (-14.622). SFL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 491M vs. ASC (174M). SFL has more cash in the bank: 178M vs. ASC (47.4M). ASC has less debt than SFL: ASC (24M) vs SFL (2.88B). SFL has higher revenues than ASC: SFL (850M) vs ASC (406M).
ASCSFLASC / SFL
Capitalization404M1.21B33%
EBITDA174M491M35%
Gain YTD-14.622-5.383272%
P/E Ratio3.1622.1514%
Revenue406M850M48%
Total Cash47.4M178M27%
Total Debt24M2.88B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASC vs SFL: Fundamental Ratings
ASC
SFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2076
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6564
SMR RATING
1..100
4183
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6154
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9713
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a16

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASC's Valuation (12) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (18). This means that ASC’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

SFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as ASC (65). This means that SFL’s stock grew similarly to ASC’s over the last 12 months.

ASC's SMR Rating (41) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFL (83). This means that ASC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFL’s over the last 12 months.

SFL's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as ASC (61). This means that SFL’s stock grew similarly to ASC’s over the last 12 months.

SFL's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Marine Shipping industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASC (97). This means that SFL’s stock grew significantly faster than ASC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASCSFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TOYOF17.170.20
+1.18%
Toyota Motor Corp.
JIAXF2.02N/A
N/A
Jiangxi Copper Co., Ltd.
PRKWF3.21N/A
N/A
Parkway Life REIT
SPXXF7.78N/A
N/A
Sparebanken Nord Norge
AKEMF0.06N/A
-5.11%
ALASKA ENERGY METALS CORP.

SFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFL has been loosely correlated with ASC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFL jumps, then ASC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFL
1D Price
Change %
SFL100%
-1.20%
ASC - SFL
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.39%
ECO - SFL
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
GNK - SFL
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
DAC - SFL
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
SBLK - SFL
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
More