ASC
Price
$9.71
Change
+$0.10 (+1.04%)
Updated
Jun 4, 04:10 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
390.4M
62 days until earnings call
SFL
Price
$8.69
Change
+$0.07 (+0.81%)
Updated
Jun 4, 04:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.15B
70 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASC vs SFL

Header iconASC vs SFL Comparison
Open Charts ASC vs SFLBanner chart's image
ARDMORE SHIPPING
Price$9.71
Change+$0.10 (+1.04%)
Volume$200
Capitalization390.4M
SFL
Price$8.69
Change+$0.07 (+0.81%)
Volume$1.73K
Capitalization1.15B
ASC vs SFL Comparison Chart
Loading...
ASC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASC vs. SFL commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASC is a Hold and SFL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ASC: $9.61 vs. SFL: $8.62)
Brand notoriety: ASC and SFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASC: 82% vs. SFL: 66%
Market capitalization -- ASC: $390.4M vs. SFL: $1.15B
ASC [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $390.4M. SFL’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $33.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ASC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFL is a better buy in the long-term than ASC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASC is a better buy in the short-term than SFL.

Price Growth

ASC (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -2.62% price change this week, while SFL (@Marine Shipping) price change was +0.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

SFL is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+1.47% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFL($1.15B) has a higher market cap than ASC($390M). SFL has higher P/E ratio than ASC: SFL (21.02) vs ASC (3.16). SFL YTD gains are higher at: -12.895 vs. ASC (-19.797). SFL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 559M vs. ASC (174M). ASC has less debt than SFL: ASC (44.2M) vs SFL (2.82B). SFL has higher revenues than ASC: SFL (873M) vs ASC (406M).
ASCSFLASC / SFL
Capitalization390M1.15B34%
EBITDA174M559M31%
Gain YTD-19.797-12.895154%
P/E Ratio3.1621.0215%
Revenue406M873M47%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt44.2M2.82B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASC vs SFL: Fundamental Ratings
ASC
SFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1217
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7069
SMR RATING
1..100
4159
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6360
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9716
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASC's Valuation (12) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (19). This means that ASC’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

SFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as ASC (70). This means that SFL’s stock grew similarly to ASC’s over the last 12 months.

ASC's SMR Rating (41) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (59). This means that ASC’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

SFL's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as ASC (63). This means that SFL’s stock grew similarly to ASC’s over the last 12 months.

SFL's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Marine Shipping industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASC (97). This means that SFL’s stock grew significantly faster than ASC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASCSFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WMICX7.610.11
+1.47%
Wasatch Micro Cap
BPTIX206.50N/A
N/A
Baron Partners Institutional
TRVHX17.30N/A
N/A
Nuveen Mid Cap Value I
WQAUX11.51N/A
N/A
Westwood Quality AllCap Ultra
BSGPX13.32-0.11
-0.82%
Baillie Gifford Developed EAFE All Cap I

ASC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASC has been closely correlated with ECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASC jumps, then ECO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASC
1D Price
Change %
ASC100%
-0.52%
ECO - ASC
69%
Closely correlated
-2.88%
HAFN - ASC
68%
Closely correlated
-2.73%
NAT - ASC
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
SFL - ASC
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SB - ASC
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
More

SFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFL has been loosely correlated with ASC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFL jumps, then ASC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFL
1D Price
Change %
SFL100%
N/A
ASC - SFL
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
ECO - SFL
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.88%
GNK - SFL
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
DAC - SFL
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
SBLK - SFL
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
More