ASCBF
Price
$11.75
Change
+$0.06 (+0.51%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
26.7M
PLMIU
Price
$10.89
Change
+$1.19 (+12.27%)
Updated
Sep 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASCBF vs PLMIU

Header iconASCBF vs PLMIU Comparison
Open Charts ASCBF vs PLMIUBanner chart's image
A SPAC II Acquisition
Price$11.75
Change+$0.06 (+0.51%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization26.7M
Plum Acquisition
Price$10.89
Change+$1.19 (+12.27%)
Volume$2.5K
CapitalizationN/A
ASCBF vs PLMIU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASCBF vs. PLMIU commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASCBF is a Buy and PLMIU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ASCBF: $11.75 vs. PLMIU: $10.89)
Brand notoriety: ASCBF and PLMIU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASCBF: 37% vs. PLMIU: 100%
Market capitalization -- ASCBF: $26.7M vs. PLMIU: $0
ASCBF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $26.7M. PLMIU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASCBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLMIU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASCBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PLMIU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ASCBF and PLMIU are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASCBF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ASCBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

ASCBF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.51% price change this week, while PLMIU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +90.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.88% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASCBF YTD gains are higher at: 7.110 vs. PLMIU (0.000). PLMIU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 725K vs. ASCBF (-842.03K). ASCBF has more cash in the bank: 442K vs. PLMIU (94.7K). ASCBF has less debt than PLMIU: ASCBF (225K) vs PLMIU (1.25M). ASCBF (0) and PLMIU (0) have equivalent revenues.
ASCBFPLMIUASCBF / PLMIU
Capitalization26.7MN/A-
EBITDA-842.03K725K-116%
Gain YTD7.1100.000-
P/E Ratio24.76N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash442K94.7K467%
Total Debt225K1.25M18%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASCBFPLMIU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTGOF2.940.02
+0.68%
BT Group Plc
CDBMF0.56N/A
N/A
Cordoba Minerals Corp.
LOQPF6.76N/A
N/A
Accesso Technology Group Plc
NRDXF22.05N/A
N/A
NORDEX SE
OICT10.05N/A
N/A
Oicintra, Inc.

ASCBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASCBF and PLMIU have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASCBF and PLMIU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASCBF
1D Price
Change %
ASCBF100%
N/A
PLMIU - ASCBF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PEGR - ASCBF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASUUF - ASCBF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNTN - ASCBF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
VMCUF - ASCBF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PLMIU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLMIU has been loosely correlated with CXAI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLMIU jumps, then CXAI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLMIU
1D Price
Change %
PLMIU100%
N/A
CXAI - PLMIU
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
CMCAF - PLMIU
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RRACF - PLMIU
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALCYU - PLMIU
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASCBF - PLMIU
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More