ASCJF
Price
$2.70
Change
-$0.02 (-0.74%)
Updated
Feb 14 closing price
Capitalization
173.23M
BWLP
Price
$12.51
Change
-$0.21 (-1.65%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.91B
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ASCJF vs BWLP

Header iconASCJF vs BWLP Comparison
Open Charts ASCJF vs BWLPBanner chart's image
AMSC ASA
Price$2.70
Change-$0.02 (-0.74%)
Volume$900
Capitalization173.23M
BW LPG
Price$12.51
Change-$0.21 (-1.65%)
Volume$225.2K
Capitalization1.91B
ASCJF vs BWLP Comparison Chart
Loading...
BWLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASCJF vs. BWLP commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASCJF is a Hold and BWLP is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (ASCJF: $2.70 vs. BWLP: $12.51)
Brand notoriety: ASCJF and BWLP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASCJF: 38% vs. BWLP: 47%
Market capitalization -- ASCJF: $173.23M vs. BWLP: $1.91B
ASCJF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $173.23M. BWLP’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $29.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASCJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBWLP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ASCJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BWLP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWLP is a better buy in the long-term than ASCJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWLP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BWLP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

ASCJF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BWLP (@Marine Shipping) price change was -1.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWLP is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.17% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWLP($1.91B) has a higher market cap than ASCJF($173M). BWLP has higher P/E ratio than ASCJF: BWLP (3.49) vs ASCJF (2.83). ASCJF YTD gains are higher at: 20.000 vs. BWLP (10.123). BWLP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 773M vs. ASCJF (-54.39M). ASCJF has more cash in the bank: 345M vs. BWLP (316M). ASCJF has less debt than BWLP: ASCJF (0) vs BWLP (602M). BWLP has higher revenues than ASCJF: BWLP (3.6B) vs ASCJF (0).
ASCJFBWLPASCJF / BWLP
Capitalization173M1.91B9%
EBITDA-54.39M773M-7%
Gain YTD20.00010.123198%
P/E Ratio2.833.4981%
Revenue03.6B-
Total Cash345M316M109%
Total Debt0602M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASCJF vs BWLP: Fundamental Ratings
ASCJF
BWLP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5076
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10034
SMR RATING
1..100
1229
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5156
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9950
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASCJF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BWLP (3). This means that ASCJF’s stock grew similarly to BWLP’s over the last 12 months.

BWLP's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASCJF (100). This means that BWLP’s stock grew significantly faster than ASCJF’s over the last 12 months.

ASCJF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as BWLP (29). This means that ASCJF’s stock grew similarly to BWLP’s over the last 12 months.

ASCJF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as BWLP (56). This means that ASCJF’s stock grew similarly to BWLP’s over the last 12 months.

BWLP's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASCJF (99). This means that BWLP’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASCJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWLP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BWLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VADDX74.73-1.07
-1.41%
Invesco Equally-Wtd S&P 500 Y
TMFCX21.31-0.41
-1.89%
Touchstone Mid Cap Value C
CHUSX27.93-0.82
-2.85%
Alger Global Equity A
NEEIX63.96-2.00
-3.03%
Needham Growth Institutional
CMGYX28.38-1.25
-4.22%
Columbia Select Mid Cap Gro Fd I3

ASCJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASCJF has been loosely correlated with KAIKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ASCJF jumps, then KAIKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASCJF
1D Price
Change %
ASCJF100%
N/A
KAIKY - ASCJF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BWLP - ASCJF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
CICOY - ASCJF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CKNHF - ASCJF
3%
Poorly correlated
+9.16%
DLPTF - ASCJF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BWLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWLP has been loosely correlated with HAFN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWLP jumps, then HAFN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWLP
1D Price
Change %
BWLP100%
-1.65%
HAFN - BWLP
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ECO - BWLP
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.14%
CMRE - BWLP
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
SFL - BWLP
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
ASC - BWLP
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.57%
More