BWLP
Price
$20.13
Change
+$0.45 (+2.29%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.98B
45 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HAFN
Price
$7.32
Change
+$0.05 (+0.69%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.58B
45 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWLP vs HAFN

BWLP vs HAFN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWLP vs. HAFN commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLP is a StrongBuy and HAFN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (BWLP: $20.13 vs. HAFN: $7.32)
Brand notoriety: BWLP and HAFN are both not notable
BWLP represents the Oil & Gas Pipelines, while HAFN is part of the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWLP: 70% vs. HAFN: 70%
Market capitalization -- BWLP: $2.98B vs. HAFN: $3.58B
BWLP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $2.98B. HAFN’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $3.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $119.93B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.28B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $17.21B. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $1.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWLP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHAFN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BWLP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HAFN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWLP is a better buy in the long-term than HAFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWLP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAFN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWLP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HAFN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HAFN is a better buy in the short-term than BWLP.

Price Growth

BWLP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +6.62% price change this week, while HAFN (@Marine Shipping) price change was +2.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +18.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.56%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWLP is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2026.

HAFN is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+18.55% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

@Marine Shipping (-0.09% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAFN($3.58B) has a higher market cap than BWLP($2.98B). BWLP (8.46) and HAFN (8.13) have similar P/E ratio . BWLP YTD gains are higher at: 65.000 vs. HAFN (46.077). BWLP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 748M vs. HAFN (706M). HAFN has more cash in the bank: 146M vs. BWLP (93.5M). HAFN has less debt than BWLP: HAFN (1.03B) vs BWLP (1.09B). BWLP has higher revenues than HAFN: BWLP (3.56B) vs HAFN (2.41B).
BWLPHAFNBWLP / HAFN
Capitalization2.98B3.58B83%
EBITDA748M706M106%
Gain YTD65.00046.077141%
P/E Ratio8.468.13104%
Revenue3.56B2.41B148%
Total Cash93.5M146M64%
Total Debt1.09B1.03B106%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWLP: Fundamental Ratings
BWLP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
18
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWLPHAFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWLP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HAFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TBF24.870.15
+0.61%
ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury
REET27.910.10
+0.36%
iShares Global REIT ETF
IONZ3.82N/A
N/A
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF
CMBS48.38-0.04
-0.09%
iShares CMBS ETF
DECP32.64-0.08
-0.26%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Dec

BWLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWLP has been closely correlated with LPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWLP jumps, then LPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWLP
1D Price
Change %
BWLP100%
+2.29%
LPG - BWLP
72%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
TRMD - BWLP
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.10%
INSW - BWLP
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.61%
FRO - BWLP
59%
Loosely correlated
-3.17%
TNK - BWLP
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.39%
More

HAFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAFN has been closely correlated with ASC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAFN jumps, then ASC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAFN
1D Price
Change %
HAFN100%
+0.69%
ASC - HAFN
74%
Closely correlated
-3.42%
ECO - HAFN
69%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
NAT - HAFN
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
NMM - HAFN
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
BWLP - HAFN
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.29%
More