Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASERX vs RGACX
ASERX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ASERX vs RGACX
ASERX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASERX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASERX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. ASERX (6.4B). ASERX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . ASERX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ASERX (21 years) vs RGACX (24 years). ASERX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ASERX (22.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ASERX: RGACX (250) vs ASERX (2500). ASERX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.11 vs. RGACX (3.68). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. ASERX (8.44).
| ASERX | RGACX | ASERX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.93 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.93 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.259 | 6.959 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.4B | 357B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.11 | 3.68 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.61 | 37.13 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.44 | 13.46 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.04 | 97.58 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement