ASFT
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.11 (-30.56%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.07M
ULY
Price
$0.53
Change
+$0.03 (+6.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
24.69M
53 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ASFT vs ULY

Header iconASFT vs ULY Comparison
Open Charts ASFT vs ULYBanner chart's image
AppSoft Technologies
Price$0.25
Change-$0.11 (-30.56%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.07M
Urgently
Price$0.53
Change+$0.03 (+6.00%)
Volume$119.36K
Capitalization24.69M
ASFT vs ULY Comparison Chart
Loading...
ULY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASFT vs. ULY commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASFT is a Hold and ULY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ASFT: $0.25 vs. ULY: $0.53)
Brand notoriety: ASFT and ULY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASFT: 100% vs. ULY: 48%
Market capitalization -- ASFT: $2.07M vs. ULY: $24.69M
ASFT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.07M. ULY’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $24.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASFT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileULY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ASFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ULY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ULY is a better buy in the long-term than ASFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ULY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ULY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

ASFT (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ULY (@Packaged Software) price change was +6.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

ULY is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ULY($24.7M) has a higher market cap than ASFT($2.07M). ULY YTD gains are higher at: 3.922 vs. ASFT (0.000). ASFT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -43.98K vs. ULY (-34.74M). ULY has more cash in the bank: 8.67M vs. ASFT (33). ASFT has less debt than ULY: ASFT (345K) vs ULY (131M). ULY has higher revenues than ASFT: ULY (192M) vs ASFT (0).
ASFTULYASFT / ULY
Capitalization2.07M24.7M8%
EBITDA-43.98K-34.74M0%
Gain YTD0.0003.922-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0192M-
Total Cash338.67M0%
Total Debt345K131M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASFT: Fundamental Ratings
ASFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASFTULY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ULY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSVRX15.630.10
+0.64%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value R
HLQVX20.410.13
+0.64%
JPMorgan Large Cap Value I
UIVQX12.250.07
+0.57%
MFS Intrinsic Value R4
WCEIX10.740.03
+0.28%
Virtus Westchester Event-Driven Fd I
LVOTX20.800.04
+0.19%
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities R5

ASFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASFT has been loosely correlated with UPLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ASFT jumps, then UPLD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASFT
1D Price
Change %
ASFT100%
N/A
UPLD - ASFT
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.76%
CCOEF - ASFT
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SQNNY - ASFT
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BHAT - ASFT
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.73%
CCOEY - ASFT
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
More

ULY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ULY and PERF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ULY and PERF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ULY
1D Price
Change %
ULY100%
+6.00%
PERF - ULY
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.17%
OCLCF - ULY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTCR - ULY
23%
Poorly correlated
-12.35%
ASFT - ULY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XBP - ULY
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.56%
More