Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASHR vs MCHS
ASHR vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts ASHR vs MCHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A ETF
Price$28.98
Change-$0.05 (-0.17%)
Volume$17.42K
Net Assets2.11B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$31.30
Change+$0.08 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.49M
ASHR vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASHR vs. MCHS commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASHR is a Buy and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASHR has more net assets: 2.11B vs. MCHS (2.49M). MCHS has a higher annual dividend yield than ASHR: MCHS (22.553) vs ASHR (9.445). ASHR was incepted earlier than MCHS: ASHR (12 years) vs MCHS (2 years). ASHR (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover ASHR (50.00) vs ASHR (50.00).
| ASHR | MCHS | ASHR / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 9.445 | 22.553 | 42% |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 2.49M | 84,625% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Turnover | 50.00 | 115.31 | 43% |
| Yield | 1.09 | 4.86 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ASHR | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 82% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 46% Loosely correlated | +6.85% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.89% |