Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASHR vs MCHS
ASHR vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts ASHR vs MCHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A ETF
Price$32.33
Change+$0.06 (+0.19%)
Volume$6.81M
Net Assets1.71B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$33.44
Change+$0.40 (+1.21%)
Volume$128
Net Assets2.62M
ASHR vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASHR vs. MCHS commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASHR is a Hold and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASHR has more net assets: 1.71B vs. MCHS (2.62M). MCHS has a higher annual dividend yield than ASHR: MCHS (31.288) vs ASHR (22.138). ASHR was incepted earlier than MCHS: ASHR (12 years) vs MCHS (2 years). ASHR (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). ASHR has a higher turnover MCHS (115.31) vs MCHS (115.31).
| ASHR | MCHS | ASHR / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 22.138 | 31.288 | 71% |
| Net Assets | 1.71B | 2.62M | 65,242% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Turnover | 143.00 | 115.31 | 124% |
| Yield | 0.91 | 4.04 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ASHR | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VALLX | 48.58 | 0.46 | +0.96% |
| Value Line Larger Companies Focused Inv | |||
| CLBFX | 39.14 | 0.27 | +0.69% |
| American Funds American Balanced 529F | |||
| FCVAX | 19.15 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value A | |||
| OAYEX | 22.36 | N/A | N/A |
| Oakmark International Small Cap Advisor | |||
| CBGAX | 14.89 | N/A | N/A |
| ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Inc C | |||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | +1.23% | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.47% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 37% Loosely correlated | +4.52% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.59% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.34% |