Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASHR vs MCHS
ASHR vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts ASHR vs MCHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A ETF
Price$32.53
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Volume$36.23K
Net Assets1.74B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$32.53
Change-$0.10 (-0.31%)
Volume$100
Net Assets2.66M
ASHR vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASHR vs. MCHS commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASHR is a Hold and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASHR has more net assets: 1.74B vs. MCHS (2.66M). MCHS has a higher annual dividend yield than ASHR: MCHS (28.093) vs ASHR (22.894). ASHR was incepted earlier than MCHS: ASHR (12 years) vs MCHS (2 years). ASHR (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). ASHR has a higher turnover MCHS (115.31) vs MCHS (115.31).
| ASHR | MCHS | ASHR / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 22.894 | 28.093 | 81% |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 2.66M | 65,338% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Turnover | 143.00 | 115.31 | 124% |
| Yield | 0.91 | 4.17 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ASHR | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | -1.46% | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.22% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.05% |