Ad is loading...
ASHS vs CQQQ
ASHS vs CQQQ Comparison
Open Charts ASHS vs CQQQ
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 CHN A SmCp ETF
Price$27.08
Change-$0.07 (-0.26%)
Volume$4.69K
Net Assets25.94M
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$39.95
Change+$0.10 (+0.25%)
Volume$211.16K
Net Assets920.33M
ASHS vs CQQQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASHS vs. CQQQ commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASHS is a Hold and CQQQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 920M vs. ASHS (25.9M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than ASHS: CQQQ (1.447) vs ASHS (-2.444). ASHS was incepted earlier than CQQQ: ASHS (11 years) vs CQQQ (15 years). ASHS (0.65) and CQQQ (0.65) have comparable expense ratios . CQQQ has a higher turnover ASHS (25.00) vs ASHS (25.00).
| ASHS | CQQQ | ASHS / CQQQ | |
| Gain YTD | -2.444 | 1.447 | -169% |
| Net Assets | 25.9M | 920M | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.65 | 100% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 43.00 | 58% |
| Yield | 0.66 | 0.25 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ASHS | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 73% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 80% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | +8.32% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||