ASNS
Price
$0.60
Change
+$0.04 (+7.14%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
3.11M
CLFD
Price
$33.26
Change
-$10.88 (-24.65%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
453.55M
90 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASNS vs CLFD

Header iconASNS vs CLFD Comparison
Open Charts ASNS vs CLFDBanner chart's image
Actelis Networks
Price$0.60
Change+$0.04 (+7.14%)
Volume$922.36K
Capitalization3.11M
Clearfield
Price$33.26
Change-$10.88 (-24.65%)
Volume$885.89K
Capitalization453.55M
ASNS vs CLFD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASNS vs. CLFD commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASNS is a Buy and CLFD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ASNS: $0.60 vs. CLFD: $33.28)
Brand notoriety: ASNS and CLFD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASNS: 336% vs. CLFD: 618%
Market capitalization -- ASNS: $3.11M vs. CLFD: $453.55M
ASNS [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $3.11M. CLFD’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $453.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASNS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLFD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASNS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLFD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ASNS and CLFD are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASNS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLFD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASNS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CLFD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASNS is a better buy in the short-term than CLFD.

Price Growth

ASNS (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +19.76% price change this week, while CLFD (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -24.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +5.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLFD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (+5.37% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLFD($454M) has a higher market cap than ASNS($3.11M). CLFD YTD gains are higher at: 7.355 vs. ASNS (-55.224). CLFD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.6M vs. ASNS (-5.49M). CLFD has more cash in the bank: 163M vs. ASNS (817K). ASNS has less debt than CLFD: ASNS (5.39M) vs CLFD (19.5M). CLFD has higher revenues than ASNS: CLFD (217M) vs ASNS (5.61M).
ASNSCLFDASNS / CLFD
Capitalization3.11M454M1%
EBITDA-5.49M24.6M-22%
Gain YTD-55.2247.355-751%
P/E RatioN/A37.60-
Revenue5.61M217M3%
Total Cash817K163M1%
Total Debt5.39M19.5M28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASNS vs CLFD: Fundamental Ratings
ASNS
CLFD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8662
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10083
SMR RATING
1..100
10091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASNS's Valuation (43) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLFD (96) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that ASNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as ASNS (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to ASNS’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's SMR Rating (91) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as ASNS (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to ASNS’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASNS (90) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASNS’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as ASNS (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to ASNS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASNSCLFD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DREYX40.680.08
+0.20%
Davis Real Estate Y
PHLAX31.73N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Health Sciences A
FTGRX28.97N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock M
GILLX23.73N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity Inst
SSGVX137.05N/A
N/A
State Street Glb All Cap Eq ex-US Idx

ASNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASNS has been loosely correlated with MITQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ASNS jumps, then MITQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASNS
1D Price
Change %
ASNS100%
+8.05%
MITQ - ASNS
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
CMTL - ASNS
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
KVHI - ASNS
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
OCC - ASNS
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.85%
CLFD - ASNS
27%
Poorly correlated
-24.60%
More

CLFD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLFD has been loosely correlated with EXTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLFD jumps, then EXTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLFD
1D Price
Change %
CLFD100%
-24.60%
EXTR - CLFD
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
ZBRA - CLFD
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.58%
DGII - CLFD
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
HPE - CLFD
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
LITE - CLFD
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
More