Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASRCX vs MGLCX
ASRCX vs MGLCX Comparison
Open Charts ASRCX vs MGLCX
ASRCX vs MGLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASRCX vs. MGLCX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASRCX is a Buy and MGLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. ASRCX (364M). MGLCX pays higher dividends than ASRCX: MGLCX (1.88) vs ASRCX (1.70). ASRCX was incepted earlier than MGLCX: ASRCX (19 years) vs MGLCX (12 years). ASRCX (2.01) and MGLCX (1.94) have similar cost to investors . ASRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 105.00 vs. MGLCX (35.00). ASRCX (1000) and MGLCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ASRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.87 vs. MGLCX (12.82). ASRCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.84 vs. MGLCX (-9.19).
| ASRCX | MGLCX | ASRCX / MGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.93 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.94 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.120 | 13.597 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 364M | 2.24B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.88 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.87 | 12.82 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.97 | 16.60 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.84 | -9.19 | -53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.60 | 18.12 | 147% |