Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASRCX vs MGLJX
ASRCX vs MGLJX Comparison
Open Charts ASRCX vs MGLJX
ASRCX vs MGLJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASRCX vs. MGLJX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASRCX is a Hold and MGLJX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLJX has more cash in the bank: 2.19B vs. ASRCX (357M). MGLJX pays higher dividends than ASRCX: MGLJX (2.00) vs ASRCX (1.70). ASRCX was incepted earlier than MGLJX: ASRCX (19 years) vs MGLJX (12 years). ASRCX (2.01) and MGLJX (1.94) have similar cost to investors . ASRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 105.00 vs. MGLJX (35.00). MGLJX has a lower initial minimum investment than ASRCX: MGLJX (0) vs ASRCX (1000). ASRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.28 vs. MGLJX (9.34). ASRCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.15 vs. MGLJX (-9.33).
| ASRCX | MGLJX | ASRCX / MGLJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.93 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.94 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.304 | 10.207 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357M | 2.19B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 2.00 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.28 | 9.34 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.78 | 16.49 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.15 | -9.33 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.29 | 18.46 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement