Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASRCX vs MGLJX
ASRCX vs MGLJX Comparison
Open Charts ASRCX vs MGLJX
ASRCX vs MGLJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASRCX vs. MGLJX commentary
Sep 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASRCX is a Hold and MGLJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLJX has more cash in the bank: 1.87B vs. ASRCX (346M). MGLJX pays higher dividends than ASRCX: MGLJX (2.01) vs ASRCX (1.71). ASRCX was incepted earlier than MGLJX: ASRCX (20 years) vs MGLJX (12 years). ASRCX (2.01) and MGLJX (1.94) have similar cost to investors . ASRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 105.00 vs. MGLJX (35.00). MGLJX has a lower initial minimum investment than ASRCX: MGLJX (0) vs ASRCX (1000). ASRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.05 vs. MGLJX (6.27). ASRCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.01 vs. MGLJX (-15.48).
| ASRCX | MGLJX | ASRCX / MGLJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.93 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.94 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.223 | 7.702 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 346M | 1.87B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 2.01 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.05 | 6.27 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.86 | 17.25 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.01 | -15.48 | 0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.64 | 15.88 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers