Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASVRX vs FSCCX
ASVRX vs FSCCX Comparison
Open Charts ASVRX vs FSCCX
ASVRX vs FSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASVRX vs. FSCCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASVRX is a Hold and FSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASVRX has more cash in the bank: 2.77B vs. FSCCX (281M). FSCCX pays higher dividends than ASVRX: FSCCX (0.94) vs ASVRX (0.42). ASVRX was incepted earlier than FSCCX: ASVRX (17 years) vs FSCCX (32 years). ASVRX (1.60) is less costly to investors than FSCCX (1.05). ASVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSCCX (21.00). ASVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCCX: ASVRX (2500) vs FSCCX (100000). FSCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.19 vs. ASVRX (0.25). FSCCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.66 vs. ASVRX (-2.93).
| ASVRX | FSCCX | ASVRX / FSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.95 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.05 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.956 | 15.207 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.77B | 281M | 984% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.94 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.25 | 13.19 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.48 | 46.58 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.93 | 45.66 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.45 | 88.04 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers