ASXFF
Price
$46.39
Change
+$0.03 (+0.06%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
9.5B
MCQEF
Price
$140.46
Change
-$16.31 (-10.40%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
45.69B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASXFF vs MCQEF

Header iconASXFF vs MCQEF Comparison
Open Charts ASXFF vs MCQEFBanner chart's image
ASX
Price$46.39
Change+$0.03 (+0.06%)
Volume$290
Capitalization9.5B
Macquarie Group
Price$140.46
Change-$16.31 (-10.40%)
Volume$1.47K
Capitalization45.69B
ASXFF vs MCQEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASXFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCQEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASXFF vs. MCQEF commentary
Jul 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASXFF is a Buy and MCQEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ASXFF: $46.39 vs. MCQEF: $140.46)
Brand notoriety: ASXFF and MCQEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASXFF: 22% vs. MCQEF: 347%
Market capitalization -- ASXFF: $9.5B vs. MCQEF: $45.69B
ASXFF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $9.5B. MCQEF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $45.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASXFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCQEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ASXFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCQEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCQEF is a better buy in the long-term than ASXFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASXFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCQEF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASXFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MCQEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASXFF is a better buy in the short-term than MCQEF.

Price Growth

ASXFF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.07% price change this week, while MCQEF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -10.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.75%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.45% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCQEF($45.7B) has a higher market cap than ASXFF($9.5B). ASXFF has higher P/E ratio than MCQEF: ASXFF (26.53) vs MCQEF (13.00). ASXFF YTD gains are higher at: 14.504 vs. MCQEF (4.414). MCQEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.8B vs. ASXFF (796M). MCQEF has higher revenues than ASXFF: MCQEF (6.56B) vs ASXFF (1.04B).
ASXFFMCQEFASXFF / MCQEF
Capitalization9.5B45.7B21%
EBITDA796M14.8B5%
Gain YTD14.5044.414329%
P/E Ratio26.5313.00204%
Revenue1.04B6.56B16%
Total CashN/A87.8B-
Total DebtN/A245B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASXFF vs MCQEF: Fundamental Ratings
ASXFF
MCQEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4990
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10037
SMR RATING
1..100
348
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3851
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCQEF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASXFF (82). This means that MCQEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASXFF’s over the last 12 months.

MCQEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASXFF (100). This means that MCQEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASXFF’s over the last 12 months.

MCQEF's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as ASXFF (34). This means that MCQEF’s stock grew similarly to ASXFF’s over the last 12 months.

ASXFF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MCQEF (51). This means that ASXFF’s stock grew similarly to MCQEF’s over the last 12 months.

ASXFF's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MCQEF (51). This means that ASXFF’s stock grew similarly to MCQEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASXFFMCQEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASXFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCQEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDC3.480.30
+9.43%
GD Culture Group Limited
NAMS21.981.06
+5.07%
NewAmsterdam Pharma Company NV
MSBI18.650.09
+0.48%
Midland States Bancorp
LOGI95.880.19
+0.20%
Logitech International SA
GECC11.00N/A
N/A
Great Elm Capital Corp

ASXFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASXFF and ASXFY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASXFF and ASXFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASXFF
1D Price
Change %
ASXFF100%
+0.07%
ASXFY - ASXFF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
MCQEF - ASXFF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLSK - ASXFF
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
PIPR - ASXFF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
BBKCF - ASXFF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
More

MCQEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCQEF and ASXFF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCQEF and ASXFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCQEF
1D Price
Change %
MCQEF100%
N/A
ASXFF - MCQEF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
NPPTF - MCQEF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
CMSQF - MCQEF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MQBKY - MCQEF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
OSCUF - MCQEF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More