ASXFF
Price
$40.30
Change
+$0.66 (+1.66%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
9.5B
PIPR
Price
$304.36
Change
+$1.86 (+0.61%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.98B
11 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ASXFF vs PIPR

Header iconASXFF vs PIPR Comparison
Open Charts ASXFF vs PIPRBanner chart's image
ASX
Price$40.30
Change+$0.66 (+1.66%)
Volume$442
Capitalization9.5B
Piper Sandler Companies
Price$304.36
Change+$1.86 (+0.61%)
Volume$53.92K
Capitalization2.98B
ASXFF vs PIPR Comparison Chart
Loading...
ASXFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASXFF vs. PIPR commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASXFF is a Hold and PIPR is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (ASXFF: $40.30 vs. PIPR: $304.36)
Brand notoriety: ASXFF and PIPR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASXFF: 139% vs. PIPR: 58%
Market capitalization -- ASXFF: $9.5B vs. PIPR: $2.98B
ASXFF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $9.5B. PIPR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASXFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePIPR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ASXFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PIPR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PIPR is a better buy in the long-term than ASXFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASXFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIPR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASXFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PIPR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASXFF is a better buy in the short-term than PIPR.

Price Growth

ASXFF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.67% price change this week, while PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +7.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +18.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

PIPR is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+18.48% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASXFF($9.5B) has a higher market cap than PIPR($2.98B). PIPR has higher P/E ratio than ASXFF: PIPR (39.76) vs ASXFF (26.53). PIPR YTD gains are higher at: 1.470 vs. ASXFF (-0.529). PIPR has higher revenues than ASXFF: PIPR (1.3B) vs ASXFF (1.04B).
ASXFFPIPRASXFF / PIPR
Capitalization9.5B2.98B319%
EBITDA796MN/A-
Gain YTD-0.5291.470-36%
P/E Ratio26.5339.7667%
Revenue1.04B1.3B80%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A164M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASXFF vs PIPR: Fundamental Ratings
ASXFF
PIPR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1005
SMR RATING
1..100
3448
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6384
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PIPR's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASXFF (96). This means that PIPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASXFF’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASXFF (100). This means that PIPR’s stock grew significantly faster than ASXFF’s over the last 12 months.

ASXFF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as PIPR (48). This means that ASXFF’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASXFF (74). This means that PIPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASXFF’s over the last 12 months.

ASXFF's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as PIPR (84). This means that ASXFF’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASXFFPIPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
50%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ASXFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGLBX26.710.28
+1.06%
Marsico Global
ECERX19.870.18
+0.91%
Eaton Vance Stock C
VEXAX149.831.00
+0.67%
Vanguard Extended Market Index Admiral
LCBSX55.000.36
+0.66%
ClearBridge Select FI
IVOYX18.720.08
+0.43%
Macquarie Mid Cap Income Opps Y

ASXFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASXFF and ASXFY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASXFF and ASXFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASXFF
1D Price
Change %
ASXFF100%
N/A
ASXFY - ASXFF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
MCQEF - ASXFF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WSFL - ASXFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLSK - ASXFF
6%
Poorly correlated
+6.17%
PIPR - ASXFF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
More

PIPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIPR has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PIPR jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIPR
1D Price
Change %
PIPR100%
+0.61%
EVR - PIPR
84%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
MC - PIPR
80%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
SF - PIPR
80%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
PJT - PIPR
77%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
HLI - PIPR
77%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
More