ASXFY
Price
$40.10
Change
-$0.62 (-1.52%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
7.85B
LDNXF
Price
$116.73
Change
-$0.54 (-0.46%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
60.79B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASXFY vs LDNXF

Header iconASXFY vs LDNXF Comparison
Open Charts ASXFY vs LDNXFBanner chart's image
ASX
Price$40.10
Change-$0.62 (-1.52%)
Volume$21.65K
Capitalization7.85B
London Stock Exchange Group
Price$116.73
Change-$0.54 (-0.46%)
Volume$2.93K
Capitalization60.79B
ASXFY vs LDNXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASXFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LDNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASXFY vs. LDNXF commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASXFY is a Buy and LDNXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ASXFY: $40.10 vs. LDNXF: $116.73)
Brand notoriety: ASXFY and LDNXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASXFY: 153% vs. LDNXF: 96%
Market capitalization -- ASXFY: $7.85B vs. LDNXF: $60.79B
ASXFY [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $7.85B. LDNXF’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $60.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $165.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $30.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASXFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLDNXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ASXFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LDNXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASXFY is a better buy in the long-term than LDNXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASXFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LDNXF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASXFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LDNXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASXFY is a better buy in the short-term than LDNXF.

Price Growth

ASXFY (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -0.17% price change this week, while LDNXF (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -5.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.53% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LDNXF($60.8B) has a higher market cap than ASXFY($7.85B). LDNXF has higher P/E ratio than ASXFY: LDNXF (46.22) vs ASXFY (23.19). ASXFY YTD gains are higher at: 4.720 vs. LDNXF (-15.844). LDNXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.29B vs. ASXFY (1.26B). ASXFY has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. LDNXF (3.66B). ASXFY has less debt than LDNXF: ASXFY (311M) vs LDNXF (9.99B). LDNXF has higher revenues than ASXFY: LDNXF (9.14B) vs ASXFY (1.13B).
ASXFYLDNXFASXFY / LDNXF
Capitalization7.85B60.8B13%
EBITDA1.26B4.29B29%
Gain YTD4.720-15.844-30%
P/E Ratio23.1946.2250%
Revenue1.13B9.14B12%
Total Cash13.9B3.66B379%
Total Debt311M9.99B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASXFY vs LDNXF: Fundamental Ratings
ASXFY
LDNXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1560
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4196
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6085
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6290
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASXFY's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as LDNXF (33). This means that ASXFY’s stock grew similarly to LDNXF’s over the last 12 months.

ASXFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LDNXF (100). This means that ASXFY’s stock grew similarly to LDNXF’s over the last 12 months.

ASXFY's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LDNXF (96). This means that ASXFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LDNXF’s over the last 12 months.

ASXFY's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as LDNXF (85). This means that ASXFY’s stock grew similarly to LDNXF’s over the last 12 months.

ASXFY's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as LDNXF (90). This means that ASXFY’s stock grew similarly to LDNXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASXFYLDNXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASXFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LDNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WYNN123.282.60
+2.15%
Wynn Resorts Limited
SES1.300.02
+1.56%
SES AI Corp
IRD1.410.01
+1.07%
Opus Genetics Inc
DBRG11.78-0.04
-0.34%
DigitalBridge Group
APVO1.40-0.10
-6.67%
Aptevo Therapeutics Inc

ASXFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASXFY has been loosely correlated with MQBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ASXFY jumps, then MQBKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASXFY
1D Price
Change %
ASXFY100%
-1.53%
MQBKY - ASXFY
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.45%
CMSQY - ASXFY
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
EVR - ASXFY
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
SF - ASXFY
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
PIPR - ASXFY
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
More

LDNXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LDNXF has been loosely correlated with LNSTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LDNXF jumps, then LNSTY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LDNXF
1D Price
Change %
LDNXF100%
-0.46%
LNSTY - LDNXF
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
MSCI - LDNXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
ASXFY - LDNXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
SPGI - LDNXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
DBOEY - LDNXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
More