Ad is loading...
ASXFY
Price
$42.58
Change
+$0.13 (+0.31%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
One day until earnings call
PIPR
Price
$336.11
Change
+$4.72 (+1.42%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
75 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ASXFY vs PIPR

Header iconASXFY vs PIPR Comparison
Open Charts ASXFY vs PIPRBanner chart's image
ASX
Price$42.58
Change+$0.13 (+0.31%)
Volume$29.63K
CapitalizationN/A
Piper Sandler Companies
Price$336.11
Change+$4.72 (+1.42%)
Volume$82.88K
CapitalizationN/A
ASXFY vs PIPR Comparison Chart
Loading...
ASXFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASXFY vs. PIPR commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASXFY is a Hold and PIPR is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ASXFY: $42.58 vs. PIPR: $336.11)
Brand notoriety: ASXFY and PIPR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASXFY: 517% vs. PIPR: 77%
Market capitalization -- ASXFY: $8.05B vs. PIPR: $2.98B
ASXFY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $8.05B. PIPR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASXFY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePIPR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ASXFY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PIPR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PIPR is a better buy in the long-term than ASXFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASXFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIPR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASXFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PIPR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PIPR is a better buy in the short-term than ASXFY.

Price Growth

ASXFY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.11% price change this week, while PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASXFY is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

PIPR is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.23% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASXFY($8.05B) has a higher market cap than PIPR($2.98B). PIPR has higher P/E ratio than ASXFY: PIPR (39.76) vs ASXFY (36.50). PIPR YTD gains are higher at: 94.874 vs. ASXFY (4.371). PIPR has higher revenues than ASXFY: PIPR (1.3B) vs ASXFY (1.04B).
ASXFYPIPRASXFY / PIPR
Capitalization8.05B2.98B271%
EBITDA660MN/A-
Gain YTD4.37194.8745%
P/E Ratio36.5039.7692%
Revenue1.04B1.3B80%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A164M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASXFY vs PIPR: Fundamental Ratings
ASXFY
PIPR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5076
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1004
SMR RATING
1..100
3553
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5137
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6367
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PIPR's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASXFY (96). This means that PIPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASXFY’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASXFY (100). This means that PIPR’s stock grew significantly faster than ASXFY’s over the last 12 months.

ASXFY's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PIPR (53). This means that ASXFY’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as ASXFY (51). This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to ASXFY’s over the last 12 months.

ASXFY's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as PIPR (67). This means that ASXFY’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASXFYPIPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ASXFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FARCX16.550.04
+0.24%
Nuveen Real Estate Securities I
ASIYX29.38-0.09
-0.31%
Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Y
HISFX17.64-0.07
-0.40%
Hennessy Small Cap Financial Instl
VWELX46.57-0.38
-0.81%
Vanguard Wellington™ Inv
IHOFX18.33-0.20
-1.08%
Hartford International Opportunities F

ASXFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASXFY has been loosely correlated with MQBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ASXFY jumps, then MQBKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASXFY
1D Price
Change %
ASXFY100%
+0.31%
MQBKY - ASXFY
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.70%
CMSQY - ASXFY
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
EVR - ASXFY
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
SF - ASXFY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
PIPR - ASXFY
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
More

PIPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIPR has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PIPR jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIPR
1D Price
Change %
PIPR100%
+1.42%
EVR - PIPR
83%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
MC - PIPR
81%
Closely correlated
-2.15%
SF - PIPR
77%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
HLI - PIPR
76%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
GS - PIPR
75%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
More