ATBHF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.39M
ATCMF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
17.84M
88 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ATBHF vs ATCMF

Header iconATBHF vs ATCMF Comparison
Open Charts ATBHF vs ATCMFBanner chart's image
Aston Bay Holdings
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$6.25K
Capitalization5.39M
Atico Mining
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.75K
Capitalization17.84M
ATBHF vs ATCMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ATBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ATCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATBHF vs. ATCMF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATBHF is a Hold and ATCMF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ATBHF: $0.04 vs. ATCMF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: ATBHF and ATCMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATBHF: 16% vs. ATCMF: 44%
Market capitalization -- ATBHF: $5.39M vs. ATCMF: $17.84M
ATBHF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $5.39M. ATCMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $17.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATBHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileATCMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ATBHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ATCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ATCMF is a better buy in the long-term than ATBHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATBHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ATCMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATBHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ATCMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ATCMF is a better buy in the short-term than ATBHF.

Price Growth

ATBHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -10.23% price change this week, while ATCMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -2.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

ATCMF is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.34% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ATCMF($17.8M) has a higher market cap than ATBHF($5.39M). ATCMF YTD gains are higher at: 19.162 vs. ATBHF (9.562). ATCMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.3M vs. ATBHF (-1.1M). ATCMF has more cash in the bank: 15.2M vs. ATBHF (34.5K). ATBHF has less debt than ATCMF: ATBHF (754K) vs ATCMF (23.8M). ATCMF has higher revenues than ATBHF: ATCMF (57.3M) vs ATBHF (0).
ATBHFATCMFATBHF / ATCMF
Capitalization5.39M17.8M30%
EBITDA-1.1M14.3M-8%
Gain YTD9.56219.16250%
P/E RatioN/A3.72-
Revenue057.3M-
Total Cash34.5K15.2M0%
Total Debt754K23.8M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATBHF vs ATCMF: Fundamental Ratings
ATBHF
ATCMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9392
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6587
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10042
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ATCMF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as ATBHF (77). This means that ATCMF’s stock grew similarly to ATBHF’s over the last 12 months.

ATCMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ATBHF (100). This means that ATCMF’s stock grew similarly to ATBHF’s over the last 12 months.

ATCMF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as ATBHF (93). This means that ATCMF’s stock grew similarly to ATBHF’s over the last 12 months.

ATBHF's Price Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as ATCMF (87). This means that ATBHF’s stock grew similarly to ATCMF’s over the last 12 months.

ATCMF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATBHF (100). This means that ATCMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATBHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATBHFATCMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ATBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ATCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRQSX13.010.15
+1.17%
Catholic Rspnsbl Invst Equity Idx Ins
BALFX34.970.22
+0.63%
American Funds American Balanced F1
LRSSX15.620.09
+0.58%
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R4
PINZX9.330.05
+0.54%
Principal Overseas Instl
DPRRX12.050.03
+0.25%
Macquarie Global Listed Real Assets R

ATBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ATBHF and NLPXF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATBHF and NLPXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATBHF
1D Price
Change %
ATBHF100%
-11.86%
NLPXF - ATBHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+13.83%
FPRGF - ATBHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+11.29%
ARXRF - ATBHF
13%
Poorly correlated
+5.88%
ATOXF - ATBHF
12%
Poorly correlated
-5.54%
ARYMF - ATBHF
8%
Poorly correlated
+5.61%
More

ATCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ATCMF and ALLIF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATCMF and ALLIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATCMF
1D Price
Change %
ATCMF100%
-0.64%
ALLIF - ATCMF
23%
Poorly correlated
-16.57%
TLGRF - ATCMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.77%
ATBHF - ATCMF
6%
Poorly correlated
-11.86%
ASHXF - ATCMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATOXF - ATCMF
3%
Poorly correlated
-5.54%
More