Alphatec Holdings (ATEC) and SI-BONE (SIBN) represent innovative players in the spine medical device market, addressing surgical needs for spinal disorders through implants, biologics, and procedural tools. This comparison analyzes their recent market performance, financial metrics, and growth drivers amid rising demand for minimally invasive spine solutions. Traders seeking momentum in healthcare devices and investors eyeing long-term sector expansion will find value in evaluating their relative positioning, revenue trajectories, and responses to recent earnings amid broader market volatility.
Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC) is a medical technology company specializing in technologies for spinal disorder treatments, including implants, biologics, navigation systems, and imaging platforms like Alpha InformatiX. In recent market activity, ATEC reported first-quarter 2026 revenue of $192 million, a 14% year-over-year increase, driven by 17% surgical revenue growth and 21% case volume expansion. Net new surgeon users rose 23%, bolstering adoption. Adjusted EBITDA reached $21 million (11% margin), up 460 basis points. However, total revenue missed expectations, contributing to heightened stock volatility, with shares dropping sharply post-earnings. The company refinanced debt via an inaugural bank facility, slashing annual interest by over $6 million and extending maturities to 2031. Full-year 2026 guidance targets $882 million in revenue (15% growth). Sentiment reflects growth durability tempered by execution risks in EOS imaging sales.
SI-BONE, Inc. (SIBN) develops implants and tools for sacroiliac joint dysfunction and pelvic fixation, featuring products like iFuse implants for fusion. Recent performance highlights steady procedural demand, with FY2025 worldwide revenue up 20% to around $201 million TTM and Q4 at $56.3 million (15% growth). U.S. revenue grew 14%, supported by gross margins near 78%. The company achieved positive adjusted EBITDA for the year and guides 14-16% revenue growth for 2026 ($228.5-$232.5 million), alongside 12.5% operating expense growth. Partnerships, such as with Smith & Nephew for iFuse TORQ distribution, expand market access. Shares have shown resilience, with analysts maintaining Buy ratings despite modest YTD gains. Sentiment centers on niche leadership and path to free cash flow positivity, though profitability remains a focus amid TTM net losses.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Featuring 25 standout bots out of 351 total, these emphasize momentum, sector rotation, and risk management in high-growth areas like semiconductors, industrials, ETFs, and volatility plays. Top performers boast annualized returns up to +169%, win rates of 60-75%, profit factors exceeding 2.0-3.0, and profit-to-drawdown ratios over 2.5, with drawdowns as low as $3,700 on model portfolios. Single-ticker agents, multi-agent ensembles, and virtual portfolios adapt in real-time, delivering precision in volatile environments. Explore these bots to align with current trends and enhance your trading edge.
ATEC and SIBN share spine sector exposure but diverge in scope: ATEC's comprehensive platform targets broader fusion markets, yielding larger scale ($192M quarterly revenue) versus SIBN's SIJ niche focus ($56M quarterly). Growth drivers include ATEC's surgeon adoption (23% net new) and case volume surges, contrasting SIBN's partnership expansions. Recent momentum favors SIBN's stability post-Q4 beats, while ATEC faced post-earnings pressure despite refinancing gains. Risks encompass execution in competitive landscapes and path to GAAP profitability; ATEC holds higher debt but improving leverage, SIBN boasts stronger cash ($148M). Market sentiment tilts toward ATEC's upside potential amid volatility, trading at a premium on growth multiples versus SIBN's value in consistency.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward SIBN for its trend consistency and lower recent volatility, evidenced by steady revenue beats and positive adjusted EBITDA amid guidance for sustained mid-teens growth. While ATEC offers superior scale and surgeon momentum with cost-saving catalysts, its earnings miss and sharp price reaction highlight elevated near-term risks. AI favors SIBN's relative stability and niche positioning, potentially yielding probabilistic outperformance in current conditions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ATEC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSIBN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ATEC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SIBN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ATEC (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -20.59% price change this week, while SIBN (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +4.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.24%.
ATEC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
SIBN is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2026.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| ATEC | SIBN | ATEC / SIBN | |
| Capitalization | 1.19B | 573M | 208% |
| EBITDA | -14.92M | -10.51M | 142% |
| Gain YTD | -63.165 | -34.331 | 184% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 764M | 201M | 380% |
| Total Cash | 161M | 148M | 109% |
| Total Debt | 596M | 36.7M | 1,624% |
ATEC | SIBN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 20 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SIBN's Valuation (36) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATEC (99). This means that SIBN’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATEC’s over the last 12 months.
SIBN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ATEC (100). This means that SIBN’s stock grew similarly to ATEC’s over the last 12 months.
SIBN's SMR Rating (93) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ATEC (100). This means that SIBN’s stock grew similarly to ATEC’s over the last 12 months.
SIBN's Price Growth Rating (81) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ATEC (95). This means that SIBN’s stock grew similarly to ATEC’s over the last 12 months.
SIBN's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ATEC (100). This means that SIBN’s stock grew similarly to ATEC’s over the last 12 months.
| ATEC | SIBN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 79% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ECDIX | 21.11 | N/A | N/A |
| Eaton Vance Global Equity Income C | |||
| MNMCX | 14.72 | N/A | N/A |
| Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L | |||
| GCEGX | 13.80 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income C | |||
| DWGAX | 16.31 | -0.07 | -0.43% |
| American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc A | |||
| NPNRX | 57.66 | -0.79 | -1.35% |
| Neuberger Large Cap Value R3 | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATEC has been loosely correlated with IRTC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ATEC jumps, then IRTC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ATEC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATEC | 100% | +10.87% | ||
| IRTC - ATEC | 50% Loosely correlated | +6.07% | ||
| SIBN - ATEC | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| IRMD - ATEC | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| BIO - ATEC | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| TFX - ATEC | 36% Loosely correlated | +6.86% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIBN has been loosely correlated with ATEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SIBN jumps, then ATEC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SIBN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIBN | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| ATEC - SIBN | 41% Loosely correlated | +10.87% | ||
| ATRC - SIBN | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| KIDS - SIBN | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.51% | ||
| UTMD - SIBN | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| AZTA - SIBN | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
More | ||||