ATEN
Price
$14.73
Change
+$0.01 (+0.07%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
20 days until earnings call
FHGDF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Ad is loading...

ATEN vs FHGDF

Header iconATEN vs FHGDF Comparison
Open Charts ATEN vs FHGDFBanner chart's image
A10 Networks
Price$14.73
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
Volume$231.46K
CapitalizationN/A
Founder Holdings
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
ATEN vs FHGDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ATEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
ATEN vs. FHGDF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATEN is a Buy and FHGDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ATEN: $14.73 vs. FHGDF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: ATEN and FHGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATEN: 42% vs. FHGDF: 16%
Market capitalization -- ATEN: $1.02B vs. FHGDF: $103.09M
ATEN [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.02B. FHGDF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $103.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATEN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFHGDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ATEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FHGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ATEN is a better buy in the long-term than FHGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATEN’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ATEN’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

ATEN (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.34% price change this week, while FHGDF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

ATEN is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ATEN($1.02B) has a higher market cap than FHGDF($103M). ATEN has higher P/E ratio than FHGDF: ATEN (25.81) vs FHGDF (21.55). FHGDF YTD gains are higher at: 138.727 vs. ATEN (13.324). ATEN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 48M vs. FHGDF (15.6M). FHGDF has more cash in the bank: 444M vs. ATEN (159M). FHGDF has less debt than ATEN: FHGDF (5.57M) vs ATEN (16.8M). FHGDF has higher revenues than ATEN: FHGDF (942M) vs ATEN (252M).
ATENFHGDFATEN / FHGDF
Capitalization1.02B103M989%
EBITDA48M15.6M308%
Gain YTD13.324138.72710%
P/E Ratio25.8121.55120%
Revenue252M942M27%
Total Cash159M444M36%
Total Debt16.8M5.57M302%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATEN vs FHGDF: Fundamental Ratings
ATEN
FHGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2739
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3559
SMR RATING
1..100
4489
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7064
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ATEN's Valuation (9) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FHGDF (35) in the null industry. This means that ATEN’s stock grew similarly to FHGDF’s over the last 12 months.

ATEN's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FHGDF (59) in the null industry. This means that ATEN’s stock grew similarly to FHGDF’s over the last 12 months.

ATEN's SMR Rating (44) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHGDF (89) in the null industry. This means that ATEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHGDF’s over the last 12 months.

FHGDF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as ATEN (45) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FHGDF’s stock grew similarly to ATEN’s over the last 12 months.

FHGDF's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as ATEN (70) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FHGDF’s stock grew similarly to ATEN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ATEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

ATEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATEN has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ATEN jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATEN
1D Price
Change %
ATEN100%
+0.07%
CLSK - ATEN
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
AVDX - ATEN
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
SPSC - ATEN
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
RIOT - ATEN
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
COIN - ATEN
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.98%
More

FHGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FHGDF and ATEN have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FHGDF and ATEN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHGDF
1D Price
Change %
FHGDF100%
N/A
ATEN - FHGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
SYT - FHGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
ISGIF - FHGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WDAY - FHGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
LTCH - FHGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More