ATEN
Price
$17.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.02B
74 days until earnings call
FHGDF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
103.09M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATEN vs FHGDF

Header iconATEN vs FHGDF Comparison
Open Charts ATEN vs FHGDFBanner chart's image
A10 Networks
Price$17.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.53K
Capitalization1.02B
Founder Holdings
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization103.09M
ATEN vs FHGDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ATEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATEN vs. FHGDF commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATEN is a Buy and FHGDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (ATEN: $17.15 vs. FHGDF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: ATEN and FHGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATEN: 1% vs. FHGDF: 173%
Market capitalization -- ATEN: $1.02B vs. FHGDF: $103.09M
ATEN [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.02B. FHGDF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $103.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATEN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFHGDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ATEN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FHGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ATEN is a better buy in the long-term than FHGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATEN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ATEN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ATEN (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.06% price change this week, while FHGDF (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

ATEN is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.90% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ATEN($1.02B) has a higher market cap than FHGDF($103M). ATEN has higher P/E ratio than FHGDF: ATEN (25.81) vs FHGDF (21.55). ATEN YTD gains are higher at: -6.216 vs. FHGDF (-10.072). ATEN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 48M vs. FHGDF (15.6M). FHGDF has more cash in the bank: 444M vs. ATEN (159M). FHGDF has less debt than ATEN: FHGDF (5.57M) vs ATEN (16.8M). FHGDF has higher revenues than ATEN: FHGDF (942M) vs ATEN (252M).
ATENFHGDFATEN / FHGDF
Capitalization1.02B103M989%
EBITDA48M15.6M308%
Gain YTD-6.216-10.07262%
P/E Ratio25.8121.55120%
Revenue252M942M27%
Total Cash159M444M36%
Total Debt16.8M5.57M302%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATEN vs FHGDF: Fundamental Ratings
ATEN
FHGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6733
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3149
SMR RATING
1..100
4089
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5160
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4511
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ATEN's Valuation (13) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHGDF (46) in the null industry. This means that ATEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHGDF’s over the last 12 months.

ATEN's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FHGDF (49) in the null industry. This means that ATEN’s stock grew similarly to FHGDF’s over the last 12 months.

ATEN's SMR Rating (40) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHGDF (89) in the null industry. This means that ATEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHGDF’s over the last 12 months.

ATEN's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FHGDF (60) in the null industry. This means that ATEN’s stock grew similarly to FHGDF’s over the last 12 months.

FHGDF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATEN (45) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FHGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATEN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLSI9.800.07
+0.72%
Greenwich LifeSciences
CRESY11.780.06
+0.51%
Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A.
TCRT2.54N/A
N/A
Alaunos Therapeutics Inc.
AVAL2.74N/A
N/A
Grupo Aval Acciones Y Valores SA
ACI21.83-0.21
-0.95%
Albertsons Companies

ATEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATEN has been loosely correlated with CPAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ATEN jumps, then CPAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATEN
1D Price
Change %
ATEN100%
N/A
CPAY - ATEN
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NTCT - ATEN
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
CYBR - ATEN
52%
Loosely correlated
+5.58%
PRO - ATEN
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
INTA - ATEN
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
More