Advertisement
ATEN vs RDWR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATEN is a StrongBuy and RDWR is a Hold.
ATEN | RDWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ATEN's Valuation (55) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RDWR (93) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that ATEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than RDWR’s over the last 12 months.
ATEN's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RDWR (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that ATEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than RDWR’s over the last 12 months.
ATEN's SMR Rating (48) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RDWR (82) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that ATEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than RDWR’s over the last 12 months.
ATEN's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as RDWR (45) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that ATEN’s stock grew similarly to RDWR’s over the last 12 months.
ATEN's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RDWR (50) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that ATEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than RDWR’s over the last 12 months.
| ATEN | RDWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 65% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ATEN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while RDWR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ATEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RDWR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ATEN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RDWR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ATEN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- RDWR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ATEN (@Computer Communications) experienced а +6.19% price change this week, while RDWR (@Computer Communications) price change was +1.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.99%.
Reported Earning Dates
ATEN is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
RDWR is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-1.83% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TMNL | 47.48 | 0.18 | +0.38% |
| T. Rowe Price Long Municipal Income ETF (TMNL) | |||
| PWZ | 22.38 | 0.07 | +0.31% |
| Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) | |||
| VALG | 14.33 | 0.04 | +0.25% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long VALE Daily ETF (VALG) | |||
| TIPZ | 49.69 | 0.12 | +0.24% |
| PIMCO Broad U.S. TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ) | |||
| BSMT | 22.30 | 0.03 | +0.14% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2029 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMT) | |||
ATEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATEN has been loosely correlated with RDWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ATEN jumps, then RDWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ATEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATEN | 100% | +1.81% | ||
| RDWR - ATEN | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| CRM - ATEN | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.10% | ||
| INTA - ATEN | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.81% | ||
| PAR - ATEN | 52% Loosely correlated | +4.58% | ||
| KVYO - ATEN | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.92% | ||
More | ||||
RDWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RDWR has been loosely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RDWR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RDWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDWR | 100% | +1.04% | ||
| CRWD - RDWR | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| NTCT - RDWR | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| OKTA - RDWR | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| PANW - RDWR | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| NET - RDWR | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
More | ||||