Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATGAX vs FSMAX
ATGAX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts ATGAX vs FSMAX
Cantor Fitzgerald Equity Opp A
Price$38.76
Change-$0.11 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.12M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.46
Change-$0.29 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
ATGAX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATGAX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATGAX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. ATGAX (73.1M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than ATGAX: FSMAX (0.46) vs ATGAX (0.00). ATGAX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: ATGAX (31 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). ATGAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). ATGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATGAX: FSMAX (0) vs ATGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.65 vs. ATGAX (-8.56). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.87 vs. ATGAX (-17.84).
| ATGAX | FSMAX | ATGAX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.04 | 4,314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.04 | 4,314% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.188 | 6.140 | 182% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.1M | 39.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.56 | 16.65 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.00 | 34.54 | -32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.84 | 52.87 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.29 | 84.94 | -24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement