Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATGAX vs FSMAX
ATGAX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts ATGAX vs FSMAX
ATGAX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATGAX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATGAX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. ATGAX (81.7M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than ATGAX: FSMAX (0.49) vs ATGAX (0.02). ATGAX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: ATGAX (32 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). ATGAX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ATGAX (17.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATGAX: FSMAX (0) vs ATGAX (1000). ATGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.78 vs. FSMAX (13.05). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. ATGAX (-21.25).
| ATGAX | FSMAX | ATGAX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.04 | 4,057% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.04 | 4,057% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.967 | 13.370 | 164% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.7M | 40.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.49 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.78 | 13.05 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.98 | 63.92 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.25 | 32.77 | -65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.06 | 133.42 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers