Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATGAX vs FSMAX
ATGAX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts ATGAX vs FSMAX
ATGAX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATGAX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATGAX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. ATGAX (80.3M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than ATGAX: FSMAX (0.48) vs ATGAX (0.02). ATGAX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: ATGAX (32 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). ATGAX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ATGAX (17.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATGAX: FSMAX (0) vs ATGAX (1000). FSMAX (24.51) and ATGAX (23.99) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.11 vs. ATGAX (-20.19).
| ATGAX | FSMAX | ATGAX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.04 | 4,057% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.04 | 4,057% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.176 | 16.033 | 138% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.3M | 43.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.48 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.99 | 24.51 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.12 | 69.75 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.19 | 35.11 | -58% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.73 | 143.87 | -1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement