Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATGAX vs FSMDX
ATGAX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ATGAX vs FSMDX
Cantor Fitzgerald Equity Opp A
Price$37.69
Change+$0.22 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.24M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.76
Change+$0.20 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
ATGAX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATGAX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATGAX is a StrongBuy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. ATGAX (72.2M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than ATGAX: FSMDX (1.31) vs ATGAX (0.00). ATGAX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ATGAX (31 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). ATGAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ATGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATGAX: FSMDX (0) vs ATGAX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.28 vs. ATGAX (-13.38). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 76.62 vs. ATGAX (-14.28).
| ATGAX | FSMDX | ATGAX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.03 | 6,040% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.03 | 6,040% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.487 | 5.556 | 135% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.2M | 42.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.38 | 15.28 | -88% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.85 | 46.71 | -4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.28 | 76.62 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.24 | 119.96 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement