Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATGAX vs FSMDX
ATGAX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ATGAX vs FSMDX
Cantor Fitzgerald Equity Opp A
Price$39.33
Change+$0.52 (+1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.56M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.58
Change+$0.22 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
ATGAX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATGAX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATGAX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. ATGAX (74.6M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than ATGAX: FSMDX (1.31) vs ATGAX (0.00). ATGAX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ATGAX (31 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). ATGAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ATGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATGAX: FSMDX (0) vs ATGAX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.20 vs. ATGAX (-7.83). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 75.40 vs. ATGAX (-13.54).
| ATGAX | FSMDX | ATGAX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.03 | 6,040% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.03 | 6,040% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.823 | 8.584 | 149% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.6M | 42.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.83 | 15.20 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.01 | 46.45 | 0% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.54 | 75.40 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.76 | 128.19 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement