Ad is loading...
ATGAX vs FSMDX
ATGAX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ATGAX vs FSMDX
Cantor Fitzgerald Equity Opp A
Price$32.96
Change+$0.82 (+2.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.28M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$31.36
Change+$0.41 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64B
ATGAX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATGAX vs. FSMDX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATGAX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. ATGAX (65.3M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than ATGAX: FSMDX (1.20) vs ATGAX (0.11). ATGAX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ATGAX (31 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). ATGAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ATGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATGAX: FSMDX (0) vs ATGAX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.81 vs. ATGAX (-24.61). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 74.96 vs. ATGAX (-21.03).
| ATGAX | FSMDX | ATGAX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.03 | 6,040% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.03 | 6,040% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.950 | -8.351 | 107% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65.3M | 37.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 1.20 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | -24.61 | 0.81 | -3,045% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.36 | 11.80 | -215% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.03 | 74.96 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.61 | 85.27 | -39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers