Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATGAX vs FSMDX
ATGAX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ATGAX vs FSMDX
Cantor Fitzgerald Equity Opp A
Price$41.30
Change-$0.10 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.86M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.46
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.37B
ATGAX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATGAX vs. FSMDX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATGAX is a StrongBuy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.4B vs. ATGAX (75.9M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than ATGAX: FSMDX (1.25) vs ATGAX (0.00). ATGAX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ATGAX (31 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). ATGAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ATGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATGAX: FSMDX (0) vs ATGAX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.82 vs. ATGAX (-5.10). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 71.97 vs. ATGAX (-12.27).
| ATGAX | FSMDX | ATGAX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.03 | 6,040% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.03 | 6,040% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.474 | 11.196 | 165% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.9M | 45.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.25 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.10 | 11.82 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.34 | 52.02 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.27 | 71.97 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.83 | 145.92 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers