Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATGAX vs FSMDX
ATGAX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ATGAX vs FSMDX
ATGAX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATGAX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATGAX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. ATGAX (79.6M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than ATGAX: FSMDX (0.99) vs ATGAX (0.02). ATGAX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ATGAX (32 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). ATGAX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ATGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATGAX: FSMDX (0) vs ATGAX (1000). ATGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.96 vs. FSMDX (22.01). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.57 vs. ATGAX (-20.01).
| ATGAX | FSMDX | ATGAX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.03 | 5,680% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.03 | 5,680% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.098 | 13.350 | 166% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.6M | 51.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.99 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.96 | 22.01 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.33 | 56.69 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.01 | 42.57 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.37 | 174.37 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers