Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATGAX vs FSMDX
ATGAX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ATGAX vs FSMDX
ATGAX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATGAX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jul 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATGAX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. ATGAX (80.3M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than ATGAX: FSMDX (0.76) vs ATGAX (0.02). ATGAX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ATGAX (32 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). ATGAX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ATGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATGAX: FSMDX (0) vs ATGAX (1000). ATGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.99 vs. FSMDX (19.78). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.30 vs. ATGAX (-20.19).
| ATGAX | FSMDX | ATGAX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.03 | 5,680% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.03 | 5,680% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.176 | 14.947 | 148% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.3M | 53.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.76 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.99 | 19.78 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.12 | 56.86 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.19 | 43.30 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.73 | 169.92 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers