Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATGAX vs FSMDX
ATGAX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ATGAX vs FSMDX
ATGAX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATGAX vs. FSMDX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATGAX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. ATGAX (81.7M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than ATGAX: FSMDX (0.75) vs ATGAX (0.02). ATGAX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ATGAX (32 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). ATGAX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ATGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATGAX: FSMDX (0) vs ATGAX (1000). ATGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.78 vs. FSMDX (13.26). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. ATGAX (-21.25).
| ATGAX | FSMDX | ATGAX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.03 | 5,680% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.03 | 5,680% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.967 | 13.837 | 159% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.7M | 53.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.75 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.78 | 13.26 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.98 | 56.18 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.25 | 40.31 | -53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.06 | 167.00 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers