It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ATGFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKEYUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ATGFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KEYUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ATGFF (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +2.20% price change this week, while KEYUF (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +0.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +4.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.92%.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
ATGFF | KEYUF | ATGFF / KEYUF | |
Capitalization | 5.53B | 5.71B | 97% |
EBITDA | 1.75B | 910M | 192% |
Gain YTD | 10.034 | 24.757 | 41% |
P/E Ratio | 12.59 | 20.70 | 61% |
Revenue | 13.6B | 7.16B | 190% |
Total Cash | 64M | 16.1M | 398% |
Total Debt | 8.64B | 4.25B | 203% |
ATGFF | KEYUF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KEYUF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as ATGFF (28). This means that KEYUF’s stock grew similarly to ATGFF’s over the last 12 months.
ATGFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as KEYUF (67). This means that ATGFF’s stock grew similarly to KEYUF’s over the last 12 months.
KEYUF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as ATGFF (80). This means that KEYUF’s stock grew similarly to ATGFF’s over the last 12 months.
KEYUF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as ATGFF (58). This means that KEYUF’s stock grew similarly to ATGFF’s over the last 12 months.
ATGFF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as KEYUF (38). This means that ATGFF’s stock grew similarly to KEYUF’s over the last 12 months.
ATGFF | KEYUF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago63% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago49% | 3 days ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 3 days ago61% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 3 days ago52% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago58% | 3 days ago64% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago56% | 9 days ago58% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 3 days ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago52% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ATGFF and WES have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATGFF and WES's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ATGFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ATGFF | 100% | N/A | ||
WES - ATGFF | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.84% | ||
KEYUF - ATGFF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.69% | ||
EPD - ATGFF | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.55% | ||
ET - ATGFF | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.94% | ||
DHT - ATGFF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.83% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KEYUF has been loosely correlated with PBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KEYUF jumps, then PBA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KEYUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KEYUF | 100% | +0.69% | ||
PBA - KEYUF | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
AM - KEYUF | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
ENB - KEYUF | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
PAA - KEYUF | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.30% | ||
ET - KEYUF | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.94% | ||
More |