Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATHDX vs FSMAX
ATHDX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts ATHDX vs FSMAX
ATHDX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATHDX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATHDX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. ATHDX (5.53B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than ATHDX: FSMAX (0.50) vs ATHDX (0.00). ATHDX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: ATHDX (13 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). ATHDX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). ATHDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). ATHDX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. ATHDX (-10.22). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. ATHDX (-14.37).
| ATHDX | FSMAX | ATHDX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.04 | 1,857% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.04 | 1,857% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.662 | 15.427 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.53B | 42.7B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.22 | 29.23 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.20 | 73.83 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.37 | 33.65 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.62 | 153.47 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement