Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATHDX vs FSMAX
ATHDX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts ATHDX vs FSMAX
ATHDX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATHDX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATHDX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. ATHDX (5.46B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than ATHDX: FSMAX (0.50) vs ATHDX (0.00). ATHDX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: ATHDX (13 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). ATHDX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). ATHDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). ATHDX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. ATHDX (-10.62). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. ATHDX (-14.95).
| ATHDX | FSMAX | ATHDX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.04 | 1,857% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.04 | 1,857% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.107 | 16.937 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.46B | 40.1B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.62 | 23.68 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.32 | 72.74 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.95 | 40.14 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.82 | 134.49 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement