Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATHDX vs FSMAX
ATHDX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts ATHDX vs FSMAX
ATHDX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATHDX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATHDX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. ATHDX (5.15B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than ATHDX: FSMAX (0.49) vs ATHDX (0.00). ATHDX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: ATHDX (13 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). ATHDX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). ATHDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). ATHDX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. ATHDX (-17.95). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. ATHDX (-20.42).
| ATHDX | FSMAX | ATHDX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.04 | 1,857% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.04 | 1,857% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.265 | 13.370 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.15B | 40.1B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.95 | 13.05 | -138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.81 | 63.92 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.42 | 32.77 | -62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.07 | 133.42 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement