Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATHGX vs FSMAX
ATHGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts ATHGX vs FSMAX
ATHGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATHGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATHGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. ATHGX (5.31B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than ATHGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs ATHGX (0.00). ATHGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: ATHGX (9 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). ATHGX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). ATHGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). ATHGX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. ATHGX (-16.67). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. ATHGX (-21.24).
| ATHGX | FSMAX | ATHGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.04 | 2,286% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.04 | 2,286% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.959 | 13.370 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.31B | 40.1B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.67 | 20.57 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.57 | 55.83 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.24 | 33.18 | -64% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 133.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement