ATPC
Price
$1.28
Change
-$0.01 (-0.78%)
Updated
Sep 26, 11:53 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
64.51M
BTSDF
Price
$1.71
Change
+$0.45 (+35.71%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.1B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATPC vs BTSDF

Header iconATPC vs BTSDF Comparison
Open Charts ATPC vs BTSDFBanner chart's image
Agape ATP
Price$1.28
Change-$0.01 (-0.78%)
Volume$137
Capitalization64.51M
Health & Happiness International Holdings
Price$1.71
Change+$0.45 (+35.71%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.1B
ATPC vs BTSDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ATPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BTSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATPC vs. BTSDF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATPC is a Hold and BTSDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ATPC: $1.29 vs. BTSDF: $1.71)
Brand notoriety: ATPC and BTSDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATPC: 7% vs. BTSDF: 99%
Market capitalization -- ATPC: $64.51M vs. BTSDF: $1.1B
ATPC [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $64.51M. BTSDF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $1.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $230.77B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATPC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBTSDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ATPC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BTSDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTSDF is a better buy in the long-term than ATPC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATPC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BTSDF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATPC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BTSDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTSDF is a better buy in the short-term than ATPC.

Price Growth

ATPC (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +0.78% price change this week, while BTSDF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +183.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-1.97% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTSDF($1.1B) has a higher market cap than ATPC($64.5M). BTSDF YTD gains are higher at: 35.714 vs. ATPC (9.322). BTSDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.08B vs. ATPC (-2.53M). BTSDF has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. ATPC (216K). ATPC has less debt than BTSDF: ATPC (293K) vs BTSDF (9.31B). BTSDF has higher revenues than ATPC: BTSDF (13.4B) vs ATPC (1.45M).
ATPCBTSDFATPC / BTSDF
Capitalization64.5M1.1B6%
EBITDA-2.53M1.08B-0%
Gain YTD9.32235.71426%
P/E RatioN/A21.24-
Revenue1.45M13.4B0%
Total Cash216K1.81B0%
Total Debt293K9.31B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATPC vs BTSDF: Fundamental Ratings
ATPC
BTSDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1036
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9699
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
228
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTSDF's Valuation (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATPC (100). This means that BTSDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

BTSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ATPC (100). This means that BTSDF’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

ATPC's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as BTSDF (99). This means that ATPC’s stock grew similarly to BTSDF’s over the last 12 months.

BTSDF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as ATPC (62). This means that BTSDF’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

BTSDF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as ATPC (22). This means that BTSDF’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATPCBTSDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BTSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WIREX23.58N/A
N/A
Wireless
PPUMX13.83N/A
N/A
Principal LargeCap Growth I R3
SCNSX19.33N/A
N/A
Allspring Common Stock Inst
SLPAX15.09N/A
N/A
SEI Small Cap A (SIIT)
PGINX25.72-0.15
-0.58%
Impax Global Environmental Markets Instl

ATPC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ATPC and UVRBF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATPC and UVRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATPC
1D Price
Change %
ATPC100%
+0.78%
UVRBF - ATPC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WWNTY - ATPC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LW - ATPC
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
WLMIF - ATPC
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DAR - ATPC
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
More

BTSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTSDF and LSF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTSDF and LSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTSDF
1D Price
Change %
BTSDF100%
N/A
LSF - BTSDF
8%
Poorly correlated
-6.89%
ATPC - BTSDF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
WWNTY - BTSDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLMIF - BTSDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGAAF - BTSDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More