ATPC
Price
$1.36
Change
-$0.02 (-1.45%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
25.44M
BTSDF
Price
$1.26
Change
-$0.04 (-3.08%)
Updated
Dec 27 closing price
Capitalization
844.49M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATPC vs BTSDF

Header iconATPC vs BTSDF Comparison
Open Charts ATPC vs BTSDFBanner chart's image
Agape ATP
Price$1.36
Change-$0.02 (-1.45%)
Volume$16.08K
Capitalization25.44M
Health & Happiness International Holdings
Price$1.26
Change-$0.04 (-3.08%)
Volume$101
Capitalization844.49M
ATPC vs BTSDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ATPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATPC vs. BTSDF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATPC is a Hold and BTSDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (ATPC: $1.36 vs. BTSDF: $1.26)
Brand notoriety: ATPC and BTSDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATPC: 15% vs. BTSDF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ATPC: $25.44M vs. BTSDF: $844.49M
ATPC [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $25.44M. BTSDF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $844.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATPC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBTSDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ATPC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BTSDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTSDF is a better buy in the long-term than ATPC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATPC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ATPC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

ATPC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +5.43% price change this week, while BTSDF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

ATPC is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.77% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTSDF($844M) has a higher market cap than ATPC($25.4M). ATPC YTD gains are higher at: 15.254 vs. BTSDF (0.000). BTSDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.56B vs. ATPC (-1.66M). BTSDF has more cash in the bank: 2.11B vs. ATPC (312K). ATPC has less debt than BTSDF: ATPC (375K) vs BTSDF (9.45B). BTSDF has higher revenues than ATPC: BTSDF (12.1B) vs ATPC (1.43M).
ATPCBTSDFATPC / BTSDF
Capitalization25.4M844M3%
EBITDA-1.66M1.56B-0%
Gain YTD15.2540.000-
P/E RatioN/A9.74-
Revenue1.43M12.1B0%
Total Cash312K2.11B0%
Total Debt375K9.45B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATPC vs BTSDF: Fundamental Ratings
ATPC
BTSDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
437
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9377
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
269
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTSDF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ATPC (100). This means that BTSDF’s stock grew significantly faster than ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

BTSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ATPC (100). This means that BTSDF’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

BTSDF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as ATPC (93). This means that BTSDF’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

BTSDF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as ATPC (64). This means that BTSDF’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

BTSDF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as ATPC (26). This means that BTSDF’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATPCBTSDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HUT21.900.82
+3.89%
Hut 8 Corp
TXMD1.180.04
+3.51%
TherapeuticsMD
ACA90.020.35
+0.39%
Arcosa
ROST131.52N/A
N/A
Ross Stores
PLBC47.50-0.02
-0.04%
Plumas Bancorp

ATPC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ATPC and UVRBF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATPC and UVRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATPC
1D Price
Change %
ATPC100%
-1.45%
UVRBF - ATPC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WWNTY - ATPC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LW - ATPC
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
WLMIF - ATPC
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRL - ATPC
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
More

BTSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTSDF and LSF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTSDF and LSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTSDF
1D Price
Change %
BTSDF100%
N/A
LSF - BTSDF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
ATPC - BTSDF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
WWNTY - BTSDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLMIF - BTSDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGAAF - BTSDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More