Investors evaluating mid-to-large-cap equities in the healthcare-adjacent industrial and medical technology sectors frequently encounter two distinct names: AptarGroup and Haemonetics. Though each touches the broader healthcare ecosystem, their business models, growth trajectories, and risk profiles could hardly be more different. ATR is a global dispensing and drug delivery packaging powerhouse with decades of steady capital returns. HAE is a specialized medical device company navigating the tail end of a strategic transformation. This comparison examines how these two stocks stack up across performance, fundamentals, and market positioning, helping traders and longer-term investors assess which name may better suit their objectives in the current environment.
AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) operates across three segments — Pharma, Beauty, and Closures — designing and manufacturing dispensing pumps, aerosol valves, and elastomeric components used in prescription drugs, injectables, fragrance, personal care, and food and beverage applications. The company reported full-year 2025 revenue of $3.78 billion, a 5% increase year-over-year, while net income rose 5% to $393 million. Reported earnings per share (EPS) reached $5.89, up 7% from the prior year. In the fourth quarter of 2025, reported sales jumped 14% to $963 million, fueled by double-digit growth in Beauty and steady gains in Pharma injectables, including GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) elastomeric components. However, adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) margin compressed to approximately 19.8% from 23.0% a year earlier, reflecting product mix shifts, higher production costs, and a decline in emergency medicine sales. AptarGroup's Board subsequently authorized a new $600 million share repurchase program, reinforcing its commitment to shareholder returns alongside a $0.48 quarterly dividend, marking the 32nd consecutive year of annual dividend increases. As of late July 2026, shares traded near $133, with a year-to-date gain of roughly 9% and a 52-week range spanning from approximately $103 to $164.
Haemonetics Corporation (HAE) is a Boston-based medical technology firm specializing in blood and plasma collection systems, hospital hemostasis management, and vascular closure devices. The company operates through Plasma, Blood Center, and Hospital segments. Haemonetics recently completed a four-year strategic transformation program aimed at pivoting its portfolio toward higher-growth, higher-margin product lines, including the divestiture of its Whole Blood business and the planned ramp-down of a legacy plasma supply agreement with CSL. In its most recent fiscal year, revenue totaled approximately $1.33 billion, representing a roughly 2% decline, while net income contracted sharply to about $97 million. Despite top-line pressure, Haemonetics has delivered notable margin expansion, with adjusted operating margins reaching the mid-20% range. The Hospital segment — particularly Blood Management Technologies such as the TEG 6s viscoelastic testing platform — has been a bright spot, while the Plasma segment's organic growth, excluding CSL-related headwinds, surged nearly 30% in recent quarters. Recent catalysts include FDA (Food and Drug Administration) clearance for the NexSys PCS Plasma Collection System with Persona PLUS technology and expanded labeling for the VASCADE MVP XL vascular closure device. As of late July 2026, shares traded near $80, reflecting a three-month surge of roughly 31%, though the stock remained virtually flat year-to-date, with a 52-week range between approximately $47 and $87.
For traders seeking data-driven assistance in navigating comparisons like this one, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and risk profiles. Only the most effective and market-aligned bots earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section — a dynamic showcase where traders can explore real-time performance metrics. Depending on the bot, users may encounter annualized returns ranging from moderate single digits to well over 100%, win rates from approximately 55% to above 85%, and profit factors exceeding 2.0 or even 4.0 in select cases. These bots employ distinct trading styles — from swing trading and trend-following to intraday price action — across holding periods that range from minutes to weeks. Whether you lean toward the defensive consistency of an ATR or the turnaround momentum of an HAE, visiting the Trending AI Robots page can help you discover AI-driven strategies tailored to current market conditions.
At the business model level, AptarGroup and Haemonetics serve fundamentally different roles. AptarGroup is an industrial-packaging and drug-delivery supplier whose diversified revenue streams span pharmaceuticals, beauty, and consumer goods, making it a relatively defensive compounder with global scale. Haemonetics, by contrast, is a focused medical device company concentrated in plasma collection and hospital-based blood management technologies, giving it higher exposure to procedure volumes, regulatory approvals, and competitive dynamics in niche healthcare markets.
On valuation, the contrast is stark. AptarGroup trades at a forward P/E (price-to-earnings) in the low-20s with a dividend yield near 1.45%, reflecting a mature, cash-generative profile. Haemonetics carries a trailing P/E near 39 — elevated due to recent earnings compression — but a forward P/E closer to 15, suggesting markets expect a significant earnings recovery as transformation-related headwinds recede.
Momentum tells a different story. Haemonetics has enjoyed a powerful rally over recent months, gaining roughly 31% in the trailing three-month period, fueled by better-than-expected quarterly results, FDA clearances, and growing analyst confidence in the post-transformation earnings trajectory. AptarGroup's three-month gain of roughly 7% reflects steadier, less volatile appreciation, consistent with its low-beta profile (0.38 versus HAE's 0.52).
Risk factors diverge as well. AptarGroup faces headwinds from emergency medicine destocking, product mix pressure on margins, and exposure to European currency fluctuations. Haemonetics must contend with the lingering revenue drag from the CSL contract wind-down, competitive pressures in vascular closure, and execution risk tied to new product commercialization. For income-oriented investors, AptarGroup's 32-year dividend growth streak is a meaningful differentiator, as Haemonetics does not currently pay a dividend.
Based on observable trend consistency, stability metrics, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely tilt favorably toward ATR in a risk-adjusted, longer-horizon assessment. AptarGroup's lower beta, diversified revenue base, consistent profitability, and multi-decade track record of returning capital to shareholders align well with AI models that prioritize trend durability and lower drawdown potential. That said, HAE could receive a stronger signal from momentum-oriented or catalyst-driven AI strategies, given its recent price surge, improving margin profile, and tangible product-related catalysts such as new FDA clearances and international product rollouts. In a probabilistic framework, AptarGroup appears the steadier compounder, while Haemonetics presents a higher-beta turnaround proposition that may appeal to algorithms calibrated for growth acceleration and mean-reversion setups. Neither stock is without near-term challenges, but the AI's preference would ultimately depend on whether the model is optimizing for stability or for momentum capture in the current market regime.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ATR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHAE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ATR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ATR (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +1.57% price change this week, while HAE (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +8.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +5.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.71%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -17.67%.
ATR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
HAE is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
@Medical/Nursing Services (+2.50% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| ATR | HAE | ATR / HAE | |
| Capitalization | 8.55B | 3.89B | 220% |
| EBITDA | 825M | 268M | 308% |
| Gain YTD | 11.091 | 6.725 | 165% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.18 | 41.73 | 58% |
| Revenue | 3.93B | 1.33B | 295% |
| Total Cash | 197M | 245M | 80% |
| Total Debt | 1.41B | 1.23B | 115% |
ATR | HAE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 61 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 68 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ATR's Valuation (13) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is significantly better than the same rating for HAE (80) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that ATR’s stock grew significantly faster than HAE’s over the last 12 months.
HAE's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ATR (95) in the Containers Or Packaging industry. This means that HAE’s stock grew similarly to ATR’s over the last 12 months.
ATR's SMR Rating (61) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as HAE (65) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that ATR’s stock grew similarly to HAE’s over the last 12 months.
HAE's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ATR (47) in the Containers Or Packaging industry. This means that HAE’s stock grew similarly to ATR’s over the last 12 months.
HAE's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATR (68) in the Containers Or Packaging industry. This means that HAE’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATR’s over the last 12 months.
| ATR | HAE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 55% | 6 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 50% | 12 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 63% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SPXL | 268.20 | 5.29 | +2.01% |
| Direxion Daily S&P500® Bull 3X ETF | |||
| SPUT | 28.20 | 0.14 | +0.50% |
| Innovator Eq Prm Inc -Daily PutWrite ETF | |||
| GJUN | 41.31 | 0.16 | +0.39% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Jun | |||
| BAMD | 33.94 | -0.15 | -0.44% |
| Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF | |||
| ARCX | 9.62 | -0.41 | -4.08% |
| Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATR has been loosely correlated with SYK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ATR jumps, then SYK could also see price increases.