Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATWAX vs FCWGX
ATWAX vs FCWGX Comparison
Open Charts ATWAX vs FCWGX
ATWAX vs FCWGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATWAX vs. FCWGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATWAX is a Buy and FCWGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCWGX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. ATWAX (1.08B). FCWGX pays higher dividends than ATWAX: FCWGX (1.53) vs ATWAX (0.85). ATWAX was incepted earlier than FCWGX: ATWAX (23 years) vs FCWGX (6 years). ATWAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FCWGX (0.51). FCWGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. ATWAX (23.00). FCWGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATWAX: FCWGX (250) vs ATWAX (2500). ATWAX (11.96) and FCWGX (11.82) have marching annual gain over last year. ATWAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.43 vs. FCWGX (37.38).
| ATWAX | FCWGX | ATWAX / FCWGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.51 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.51 | 247% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.109 | 16.213 | 75% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 158B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.53 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.96 | 11.82 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.80 | 52.92 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.43 | 37.38 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement