AU
Price
$121.22
Change
+$6.08 (+5.28%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
61.31B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WPM
Price
$157.78
Change
+$7.53 (+5.01%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
71.53B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AU vs WPM

AU vs WPM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? AngloGold Ashanti (AU) vs. Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • AngloGold Ashanti (AU) operates as a primary gold producer with direct exposure to mining operations across multiple continents, while Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) functions as a precious metals streaming company that provides capital to miners in exchange for future metal deliveries.
  • Both stocks have benefited from elevated precious metals prices in recent market activity, though their business models create distinct risk and return profiles for investors seeking sector exposure.
  • AU has offered a significantly higher dividend yield compared to WPM in recent periods, reflecting differences in capital allocation strategies between mining producers and streaming entities.
  • Market sentiment for both has been influenced by broader commodity trends and operational updates, with WPM scheduled to report second-quarter results shortly after the latest market close.
  • Relative performance highlights trade-offs in operational leverage versus contractual stability, relevant for traders monitoring gold and silver price movements.
  • Sector positioning remains tied to precious metals dynamics, with AU carrying higher production-related volatility and WPM emphasizing lower operational risk through its streaming agreements.

Introduction

AngloGold Ashanti (AU) and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) represent two distinct approaches within the precious metals sector, attracting attention from investors and traders focused on gold and silver market dynamics. AU provides direct operational exposure as a gold mining company, while WPM offers a streaming model that finances mining projects for future metal deliveries. This comparison appeals to market participants evaluating relative performance, dividend characteristics, and risk factors in the current environment of fluctuating commodity prices and sector-specific developments. Both stocks trade on major exchanges and serve as benchmarks for different strategies in precious metals investing.

AU Overview and Recent Performance

AngloGold Ashanti (AU) is a global gold mining company with operations spanning Africa, Australia, and the Americas, producing gold along with by-products such as silver. In recent weeks, the stock has reflected broader movements in gold prices, which have remained elevated amid macroeconomic factors influencing investor demand for the metal. Market activity has shown price fluctuations consistent with commodity trends, with the company maintaining its position as a key producer in the sector. Sentiment has been shaped by ongoing exploration and production updates typical of mining operations, without isolated single-day events dominating recent coverage. The stock's dividend profile has stood out relative to peers in the space during this period.

WPM Overview and Recent Performance

Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) operates as a precious metals streaming company, providing upfront capital to mining partners in return for a portion of future gold, silver, and other metal production at predetermined prices. Recent market activity has aligned the stock with precious metals price movements, supported by the company's diversified portfolio of streaming agreements. Developments include the upcoming release of second-quarter 2026 results scheduled for August 6, 2026, which typically informs investors on production volumes and financial metrics. Sentiment in recent weeks has remained tied to sector-wide commodity strength and the stability inherent in the streaming business model, with performance reflecting these contractual elements rather than direct mining costs.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a broader library of hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers across varied strategies, timeframes, and market conditions, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current environments are featured in the trending section. Available bots span a wide range of performance statistics, including varying win rates, profit factors, and drawdown metrics depending on their specific parameters and ticker sets. This curated approach allows traders to explore automated strategies suited to individual preferences while maintaining a neutral informational focus on the platform’s offerings.

Head-to-Head Comparison

AngloGold Ashanti (AU) and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) differ fundamentally in business models, with AU engaged in direct mining and exploration that carries operational and geopolitical risks, contrasted against WPM’s asset-light streaming approach that emphasizes contractual cash flows with lower direct exposure to production costs. Growth drivers for AU center on reserve expansion and mine efficiency, while WPM benefits from new streaming deals and partner production growth. Recent momentum for both has tracked precious metals prices, though AU exhibits greater sensitivity to cost inflation and output variability. Risk factors include AU’s higher leverage to commodity price swings and regulatory environments in operating regions, versus WPM’s reliance on partner performance and metal delivery reliability. Sector exposure remains similar through gold and silver, yet market sentiment often differentiates the producer’s volatility from the streamer’s relative stability in portfolio allocations.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in precious metals markets and relative positioning within their respective business models, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference toward Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) for its demonstrated stability through streaming contracts amid fluctuating commodity environments. This assessment draws from patterns in recent market activity without implying definitive outcomes, as both stocks remain subject to broader sector influences and individual investor objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AU vs. WPM commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AU is a Hold and WPM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (AU: $121.22 vs. WPM: $157.78)
Brand notoriety: AU: Not notable vs. WPM: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AU: 190% vs. WPM: 163%
Market capitalization -- AU: $61.31B vs. WPM: $71.53B
AU [@Precious Metals] is valued at $61.31B. WPM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $71.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $138.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $15.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AU’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWPM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WPM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AU is a better buy in the long-term than WPM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WPM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WPM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WPM is a better buy in the short-term than AU.

Price Growth

AU (@Precious Metals) experienced а +26.67% price change this week, while WPM (@Precious Metals) price change was +17.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +10.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

AU is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

WPM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+10.27% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WPM($71.5B) has a higher market cap than AU($61.3B). WPM has higher P/E ratio than AU: WPM (35.00) vs AU (16.25). AU YTD gains are higher at: 47.214 vs. WPM (34.850). AU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.37B vs. WPM (2.78B). AU has more cash in the bank: 1.43B vs. WPM (999M). WPM has less debt than AU: WPM (7.66M) vs AU (1.79B). AU has higher revenues than WPM: AU (11.8B) vs WPM (3.17B).
AUWPMAU / WPM
Capitalization61.3B71.5B86%
EBITDA6.37B2.78B229%
Gain YTD47.21434.850135%
P/E Ratio16.2535.0046%
Revenue11.8B3.17B372%
Total Cash1.43B999M143%
Total Debt1.79B7.66M23,375%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AU vs WPM: Fundamental Ratings
AU
WPM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4548
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2124
SMR RATING
1..100
2240
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3637
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3486
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AU's Valuation (7) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WPM (71). This means that AU’s stock grew somewhat faster than WPM’s over the last 12 months.

AU's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (24). This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.

AU's SMR Rating (22) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (40). This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.

AU's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (37). This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.

AU's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WPM (86). This means that AU’s stock grew somewhat faster than WPM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUWPM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WPM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAIC128.041.75
+1.39%
Science Applications International Corp
AMTB28.690.25
+0.88%
Amerant Bancorp
RGCO22.02-0.05
-0.23%
RGC Resources
NOC551.03-12.83
-2.28%
Northrop Grumman Corp
SCNX0.45-0.02
-4.68%
Scienture Holdings Inc

AU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AU has been closely correlated with GFI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AU jumps, then GFI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AU
1D Price
Change %
AU100%
+5.94%
GFI - AU
90%
Closely correlated
+5.19%
KGC - AU
88%
Closely correlated
+4.23%
AEM - AU
87%
Closely correlated
+1.90%
WPM - AU
87%
Closely correlated
+5.01%
NEM - AU
86%
Closely correlated
+3.09%
More