AUB
Price
$33.08
Change
-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.12B
92 days until earnings call
FSFG
Price
$25.97
Change
+$0.04 (+0.15%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
115.29M
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUB vs FSFG

Header iconAUB vs FSFG Comparison
Open Charts AUB vs FSFGBanner chart's image
Atlantic Union Bankshares
Price$33.08
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Volume$1.13M
Capitalization3.12B
First Savings Financial Group
Price$25.97
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
Volume$21.03K
Capitalization115.29M
AUB vs FSFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AUB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUB vs. FSFG commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUB is a Hold and FSFG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AUB: $33.08 vs. FSFG: $25.97)
Brand notoriety: AUB and FSFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUB: 78% vs. FSFG: 51%
Market capitalization -- AUB: $3.12B vs. FSFG: $115.29M
AUB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.12B. FSFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $115.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSFG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AUB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the long-term than AUB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSFG’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FSFG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the short-term than AUB.

Price Growth

AUB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.42% price change this week, while FSFG (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

AUB is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.49% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AUB($3.12B) has a higher market cap than FSFG($115M). FSFG has higher P/E ratio than AUB: FSFG (18.62) vs AUB (13.77). FSFG YTD gains are higher at: -0.977 vs. AUB (-10.850). AUB has more cash in the bank: 197M vs. FSFG (17.5M). FSFG has less debt than AUB: FSFG (405M) vs AUB (1.11B). AUB has higher revenues than FSFG: AUB (696M) vs FSFG (82.3M).
AUBFSFGAUB / FSFG
Capitalization3.12B115M2,709%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-10.850-0.9771,110%
P/E Ratio13.7718.6274%
Revenue696M82.3M846%
Total Cash197M17.5M1,126%
Total Debt1.11B405M274%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUB vs FSFG: Fundamental Ratings
AUB
FSFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1794
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5248
SMR RATING
1..100
1141
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5248
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6493
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSFG's Valuation (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AUB (47) in the null industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to AUB’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AUB (52) in the null industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to AUB’s over the last 12 months.

AUB's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as FSFG (41) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AUB (52) in the null industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to AUB’s over the last 12 months.

AUB's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as FSFG (93) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUBFSFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SJMHF0.390.05
+14.91%
SJM Holdings Ltd.
NWBO0.260.01
+2.87%
Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc.
HLDCY3.440.06
+1.67%
Henderson Land Development Co., Ltd.
LEIC0.15N/A
N/A
Lead Innovation Corporation
FDCFF0.03N/A
-3.21%
Forum Energy Metals Corp.

AUB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AUB has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AUB jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUB
1D Price
Change %
AUB100%
-0.03%
UCB - AUB
91%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
UBSI - AUB
91%
Closely correlated
-1.07%
CATY - AUB
90%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
FNB - AUB
90%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
ABCB - AUB
90%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
More

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
+0.15%
SHBI - FSFG
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
FUNC - FSFG
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
CZWI - FSFG
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TCBI - FSFG
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
AUB - FSFG
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
More