AUB
Price
$40.38
Change
+$0.76 (+1.92%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.78B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NBHC
Price
$44.00
Change
+$1.25 (+2.92%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.97B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUB vs NBHC

AUB vs NBHC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUB vs. NBHC commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUB is a StrongBuy and NBHC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (AUB: $40.36 vs. NBHC: $42.75)
Brand notoriety: AUB and NBHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUB: 84% vs. NBHC: 75%
Market capitalization -- AUB: $5.78B vs. NBHC: $1.91B
AUB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.78B. NBHC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNBHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AUB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NBHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AUB is a better buy in the long-term than NBHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBHC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NBHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AUB is a better buy in the short-term than NBHC.

Price Growth

AUB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.89% price change this week, while NBHC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

AUB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

NBHC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.31% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AUB($5.78B) has a higher market cap than NBHC($1.97B). AUB has higher P/E ratio than NBHC: AUB (16.93) vs NBHC (15.95). AUB YTD gains are higher at: 16.538 vs. NBHC (14.226). NBHC has more cash in the bank: 369M vs. AUB (234M). NBHC has less debt than AUB: NBHC (202M) vs AUB (1.16B). AUB has higher revenues than NBHC: AUB (1.53B) vs NBHC (436M).
AUBNBHCAUB / NBHC
Capitalization5.78B1.97B293%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.53814.226116%
P/E Ratio16.9315.95106%
Revenue1.53B436M350%
Total Cash234M369M63%
Total Debt1.16B202M574%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUB vs NBHC: Fundamental Ratings
AUB
NBHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3026
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8074
SMR RATING
1..100
2251
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3531
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AUB's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as NBHC (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

NBHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AUB (80) in the null industry. This means that NBHC’s stock grew similarly to AUB’s over the last 12 months.

AUB's SMR Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as NBHC (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

AUB's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as NBHC (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

NBHC's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AUB (35) in the null industry. This means that NBHC’s stock grew similarly to AUB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUBNBHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NBHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETHW12.400.19
+1.56%
Bitwise Ethereum ETF
HECO69.450.27
+0.39%
State Street® Galaxy HdgDgtlAstEcosysETF
WUGI95.740.11
+0.11%
AXS Esoterica NextG Economy ETF
EMBD23.87-0.12
-0.50%
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
FSCO4.84-0.09
-1.83%
FS Credit Opportunities Corp

NBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBHC has been closely correlated with CATY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NBHC jumps, then CATY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBHC
1D Price
Change %
NBHC100%
-0.16%
CATY - NBHC
84%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
PEBO - NBHC
83%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
PRK - NBHC
83%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
FCF - NBHC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
AUB - NBHC
83%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
More