AUB
Price
$41.15
Change
+$0.13 (+0.32%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.88B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PFS
Price
$23.71
Change
+$0.02 (+0.08%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.09B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUB vs PFS

AUB vs PFS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUB vs. PFS commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUB is a Hold and PFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (AUB: $41.15 vs. PFS: $23.71)
Brand notoriety: AUB and PFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUB: 111% vs. PFS: 81%
Market capitalization -- AUB: $5.88B vs. PFS: $3.09B
AUB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.88B. PFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AUB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the long-term than AUB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AUB is a better buy in the short-term than PFS.

Price Growth

AUB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.03% price change this week, while PFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

AUB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

PFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AUB($5.88B) has a higher market cap than PFS($3.09B). AUB has higher P/E ratio than PFS: AUB (12.00) vs PFS (9.88). PFS YTD gains are higher at: 23.843 vs. AUB (19.864). AUB has more cash in the bank: 451M vs. PFS (211M). AUB has less debt than PFS: AUB (1.16B) vs PFS (2.8B). AUB has higher revenues than PFS: AUB (1.53B) vs PFS (907M).
AUBPFSAUB / PFS
Capitalization5.88B3.09B190%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.86423.84383%
P/E Ratio12.009.88121%
Revenue1.53B907M169%
Total Cash451M211M214%
Total Debt1.16B2.8B41%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUB vs PFS: Fundamental Ratings
AUB
PFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7264
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6357
SMR RATING
1..100
2331
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8350
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (19) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as AUB (25) in the null industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to AUB’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as AUB (63) in the null industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to AUB’s over the last 12 months.

AUB's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as PFS (31) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as AUB (49) in the null industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to AUB’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUB (83) in the null industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUBPFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REGS11.510.05
+0.41%
Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF
JOET46.280.16
+0.34%
Virtus Terranova US Quality Momentum ETF
AIO25.730.08
+0.31%
Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund
LJAN24.780.02
+0.08%
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buf ETF -Jan
VCIT81.05-0.05
-0.06%
Vanguard Interm-Term Corp Bd ETF

AUB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AUB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AUB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUB
1D Price
Change %
AUB100%
+0.32%
UBSI - AUB
90%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
UCB - AUB
89%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
FULT - AUB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
CATY - AUB
87%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
SSB - AUB
87%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
More