AUB
Price
$40.25
Change
+$0.63 (+1.59%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.67B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PFS
Price
$23.34
Change
+$0.32 (+1.39%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUB vs PFS

AUB vs PFS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUB vs. PFS commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUB is a StrongBuy and PFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (AUB: $39.62 vs. PFS: $23.01)
Brand notoriety: AUB and PFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUB: 70% vs. PFS: 86%
Market capitalization -- AUB: $5.67B vs. PFS: $3B
AUB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.67B. PFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AUB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AUB is a better buy in the long-term than PFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AUB is a better buy in the short-term than PFS.

Price Growth

AUB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.18% price change this week, while PFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

AUB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

PFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.31% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AUB($5.67B) has a higher market cap than PFS($3B). AUB has higher P/E ratio than PFS: AUB (16.93) vs PFS (9.79). PFS YTD gains are higher at: 19.033 vs. AUB (14.402). AUB has more cash in the bank: 234M vs. PFS (211M). AUB has less debt than PFS: AUB (1.16B) vs PFS (2.8B). AUB has higher revenues than PFS: AUB (1.53B) vs PFS (887M).
AUBPFSAUB / PFS
Capitalization5.67B3B189%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.40219.03376%
P/E Ratio16.939.79173%
Revenue1.53B887M172%
Total Cash234M211M111%
Total Debt1.16B2.8B41%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUB vs PFS: Fundamental Ratings
AUB
PFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3036
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8076
SMR RATING
1..100
2231
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4545
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3584
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (17) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as AUB (31) in the null industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to AUB’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as AUB (80) in the null industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to AUB’s over the last 12 months.

AUB's SMR Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as PFS (31) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

AUB's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as PFS (45) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

AUB's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFS (84) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUBPFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BITW41.080.74
+1.83%
Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF
CLCV30.380.17
+0.57%
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF
JMSI50.290.02
+0.04%
JPMorgan Sustainable Municipal Inc ETF
SMTH25.67-0.07
-0.25%
ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF
PCM5.50-0.02
-0.36%
PCM Fund

AUB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AUB has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AUB jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUB
1D Price
Change %
AUB100%
+1.17%
UCB - AUB
90%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
UBSI - AUB
90%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
SSB - AUB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
FULT - AUB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
BKU - AUB
87%
Closely correlated
+2.02%
More

PFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFS has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFS jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFS
1D Price
Change %
PFS100%
+1.28%
TRMK - PFS
87%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
UBSI - PFS
86%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
UCB - PFS
85%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
RNST - PFS
84%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
AUB - PFS
84%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
More