AUBN
Price
$26.92
Change
+$0.76 (+2.91%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
93.8M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FDSB
Price
$18.46
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
95.86M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUBN vs FDSB

AUBN vs FDSB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUBN vs. FDSB commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUBN is a Hold and FDSB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (AUBN: $26.92 vs. FDSB: $18.46)
Brand notoriety: AUBN and FDSB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUBN: 41% vs. FDSB: 33%
Market capitalization -- AUBN: $93.8M vs. FDSB: $95.86M
AUBN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $93.8M. FDSB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $95.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUBN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFDSB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AUBN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FDSB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AUBN is a better buy in the long-term than FDSB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUBN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FDSB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUBN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • FDSB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AUBN is a better buy in the short-term than FDSB.

Price Growth

AUBN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.28% price change this week, while FDSB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDSB($95.9M) and AUBN($93.8M) have the same market capitalization . FDSB has higher P/E ratio than AUBN: FDSB (53.85) vs AUBN (11.19). FDSB YTD gains are higher at: 23.067 vs. AUBN (2.113). FDSB has less debt than AUBN: FDSB (0) vs AUBN (3.22M). AUBN has higher revenues than FDSB: AUBN (33.6M) vs FDSB (17.9M).
AUBNFDSBAUBN / FDSB
Capitalization93.8M95.9M98%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.11323.0679%
P/E Ratio11.1953.8521%
Revenue33.6M17.9M188%
Total Cash13.8MN/A-
Total Debt3.22M0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUBN: Fundamental Ratings
AUBN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
71
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUBNFDSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
17%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUBN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FDSB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TFIFX51.950.57
+1.11%
T. Rowe Price Financial Services I
HJIRX19.800.21
+1.07%
Hardman Johnston Intl Gr Fd Retl Shr
MGQIX13.230.13
+0.99%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Stars I
MKVCX19.660.14
+0.72%
MFS International Value C
FMFCX95.90N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Materials C

AUBN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUBN and SSBI have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUBN and SSBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUBN
1D Price
Change %
AUBN100%
+2.91%
SSBI - AUBN
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.01%
CFBK - AUBN
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
FSEA - AUBN
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
WSBK - AUBN
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FDSB - AUBN
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FDSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDSB has been loosely correlated with TMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDSB jumps, then TMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDSB
1D Price
Change %
FDSB100%
N/A
TMP - FDSB
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
RNST - FDSB
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
OBK - FDSB
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
AMTB - FDSB
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
PFS - FDSB
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
More