AVAL
Price
$2.85
Change
+$0.05 (+1.79%)
Updated
Jun 26, 12:37 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.62B
41 days until earnings call
SFDL
Price
$29.75
Change
+$0.25 (+0.85%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
81.33M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AVAL vs SFDL

Header iconAVAL vs SFDL Comparison
Open Charts AVAL vs SFDLBanner chart's image
Grupo Aval Acciones Y Valores SA
Price$2.85
Change+$0.05 (+1.79%)
Volume$500
Capitalization2.62B
Security Federal
Price$29.75
Change+$0.25 (+0.85%)
Volume$700
Capitalization81.33M
AVAL vs SFDL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AVAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AVAL vs. SFDL commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AVAL is a Buy and SFDL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (AVAL: $2.80 vs. SFDL: $29.75)
Brand notoriety: AVAL and SFDL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AVAL: 64% vs. SFDL: 68%
Market capitalization -- AVAL: $2.62B vs. SFDL: $81.33M
AVAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.62B. SFDL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $81.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AVAL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFDL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AVAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFDL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFDL is a better buy in the long-term than AVAL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AVAL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AVAL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AVAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.71% price change this week, while SFDL (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

AVAL is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.57% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AVAL($2.62B) has a higher market cap than SFDL($81.3M). AVAL has higher P/E ratio than SFDL: AVAL (12.61) vs SFDL (7.42). AVAL YTD gains are higher at: 41.588 vs. SFDL (11.052). AVAL has higher revenues than SFDL: AVAL (15.85T) vs SFDL (47.8M).
AVALSFDLAVAL / SFDL
Capitalization2.62B81.3M3,218%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD41.58811.052376%
P/E Ratio12.617.42170%
Revenue15.85T47.8M33,163,180%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A61.3M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AVAL vs SFDL: Fundamental Ratings
AVAL
SFDL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6732
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7860
SMR RATING
1..100
157
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9726
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFDL's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as AVAL (26) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SFDL’s stock grew similarly to AVAL’s over the last 12 months.

SFDL's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as AVAL (78) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SFDL’s stock grew similarly to AVAL’s over the last 12 months.

AVAL's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFDL (57) in the null industry. This means that AVAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFDL’s over the last 12 months.

AVAL's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SFDL (49) in the null industry. This means that AVAL’s stock grew similarly to SFDL’s over the last 12 months.

SFDL's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AVAL (97) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SFDL’s stock grew significantly faster than AVAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AVAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AVAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPHB95.320.14
+0.15%
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
BINC52.64-0.01
-0.02%
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
IMCB78.13-0.68
-0.86%
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
MGMT38.78-0.38
-0.98%
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF
ZSL25.44-0.60
-2.32%
ProShares UltraShort Silver

AVAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AVAL has been loosely correlated with CIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AVAL jumps, then CIB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AVAL
1D Price
Change %
AVAL100%
N/A
CIB - AVAL
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
BCH - AVAL
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
BSAC - AVAL
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
DB - AVAL
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
BAP - AVAL
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More

SFDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFDL and BXRBF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFDL and BXRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFDL
1D Price
Change %
SFDL100%
N/A
BXRBF - SFDL
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNFSF - SFDL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VALIF - SFDL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVAL - SFDL
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMGGF - SFDL
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More