Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AVDS vs SCZ
AVDS vs SCZ Comparison
Open Charts AVDS vs SCZ
AVDS vs SCZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AVDS vs. SCZ commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AVDS is a Hold and SCZ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCZ has more net assets: 13.2B vs. AVDS (320M). AVDS has a higher annual dividend yield than SCZ: AVDS (10.691) vs SCZ (9.725). AVDS was incepted earlier than SCZ: AVDS (3 years) vs SCZ (19 years). AVDS (0.30) has a lower expense ratio than SCZ (0.40). SCZ has a higher turnover AVDS (6.00) vs AVDS (6.00).
| AVDS | SCZ | AVDS / SCZ | |
| Gain YTD | 10.691 | 9.725 | 110% |
| Net Assets | 320M | 13.2B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.40 | 75% |
| Turnover | 6.00 | 18.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 2.30 | 3.18 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AVDS | SCZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 64% | 5 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
AVDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AVDS has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AVDS jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AVDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVDS | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| ING - AVDS | 70% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| NWG - AVDS | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| MFG - AVDS | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| SII - AVDS | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.43% | ||
| APAM - AVDS | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
More | ||||
SCZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCZ has been closely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCZ jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y