Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AVDS vs SCZ
AVDS vs SCZ Comparison
Open Charts AVDS vs SCZ
AVDS vs SCZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AVDS vs. SCZ commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AVDS is a Hold and SCZ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCZ has more net assets: 13.7B vs. AVDS (317M). SCZ (9.058) and AVDS (8.707) have matching annual dividend yield . AVDS was incepted earlier than SCZ: AVDS (3 years) vs SCZ (19 years). AVDS (0.30) has a lower expense ratio than SCZ (0.40). SCZ has a higher turnover AVDS (6.00) vs AVDS (6.00).
| AVDS | SCZ | AVDS / SCZ | |
| Gain YTD | 8.707 | 9.058 | 96% |
| Net Assets | 317M | 13.7B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.40 | 75% |
| Turnover | 6.00 | 18.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 2.33 | 3.22 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AVDS | SCZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 64% | 26 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
AVDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AVDS has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AVDS jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AVDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVDS | 100% | -1.09% | ||
| ING - AVDS | 70% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| NWG - AVDS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| MFG - AVDS | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| SII - AVDS | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.70% | ||
| APAM - AVDS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
More | ||||
SCZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCZ has been closely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCZ jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y