| AVEM | DBEM | AVEM / DBEM | |
| Gain YTD | 22.388 | 24.312 | 92% |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 109M | 25,138% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.66 | 50% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 10.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.95 | 2.18 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| AVEM | DBEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 79% | 11 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KFEB | 31.62 | 0.11 | +0.35% |
| Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Feb | |||
| IPO | 57.00 | -0.16 | -0.28% |
| Renaissance IPO ETF | |||
| FTCA | 7.29 | -0.04 | -0.55% |
| Franklin California Municipal Income ETF | |||
| TDIV | 117.04 | -0.99 | -0.84% |
| First Trust NASDAQ Technology Div ETF | |||
| EKG | 21.08 | -0.18 | -0.86% |
| First Trust Nasdaq Lux Dgtl Hlth SoluETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AVEM has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AVEM jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AVEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVEM | 100% | -0.22% | ||
| TSM - AVEM | 78% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| ASX - AVEM | 74% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| GDS - AVEM | 68% Closely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| DOYU - AVEM | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.18% | ||
| CLS - AVEM | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.62% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBEM has been loosely correlated with KC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DBEM jumps, then KC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DBEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBEM | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| KC - DBEM | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| JD - DBEM | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| BILI - DBEM | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| BIDU - DBEM | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| BZUN - DBEM | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
More | ||||