AWCA
Price
$0.35
Change
+$0.02 (+6.06%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
VGPBF
Price
$75.46
Change
-$5.69 (-7.01%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

AWCA vs VGPBF

Header iconAWCA vs VGPBF Comparison
Open Charts AWCA vs VGPBFBanner chart's image
Awaysis Capital
Price$0.35
Change+$0.02 (+6.06%)
Volume$3.59K
CapitalizationN/A
VGP SA
Price$75.46
Change-$5.69 (-7.01%)
Volume$47
CapitalizationN/A
AWCA vs VGPBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AWCA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VGPBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AWCA vs. VGPBF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWCA is a Hold and VGPBF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AWCA: $0.35 vs. VGPBF: $75.46)
Brand notoriety: AWCA and VGPBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AWCA: 36% vs. VGPBF: 66%
Market capitalization -- AWCA: $85.62M vs. VGPBF: $2.93B
AWCA [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $85.62M. VGPBF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $2.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AWCA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVGPBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AWCA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VGPBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VGPBF is a better buy in the long-term than AWCA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AWCA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VGPBF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AWCA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • VGPBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VGPBF is a better buy in the short-term than AWCA.

Price Growth

AWCA (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -49.57% price change this week, while VGPBF (@Real Estate Development) price change was -2.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-3.11% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VGPBF($2.93B) has a higher market cap than AWCA($85.6M). AWCA YTD gains are higher at: 2.324 vs. VGPBF (-36.251). AWCA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.9M vs. VGPBF (-100.39M). VGPBF has more cash in the bank: 699M vs. AWCA (27.9K). AWCA has less debt than VGPBF: AWCA (2.87M) vs VGPBF (2.37B). VGPBF has higher revenues than AWCA: VGPBF (72.8M) vs AWCA (105K).
AWCAVGPBFAWCA / VGPBF
Capitalization85.6M2.93B3%
EBITDA-3.9M-100.39M4%
Gain YTD2.324-36.251-6%
P/E RatioN/A3.54-
Revenue105K72.8M0%
Total Cash27.9K699M0%
Total Debt2.87M2.37B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AWCA: Fundamental Ratings
AWCA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
87
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AWCAVGPBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
63%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AWCA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VGPBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SWSCX23.270.05
+0.23%
Schwab Small-Cap Equity
VCSAX108.43-0.25
-0.23%
Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Admiral
HNLVX23.63-0.14
-0.59%
Harbor Large Cap Value Retirement
IEMLX9.64-0.08
-0.82%
Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Eq W
RYCKX37.54-0.43
-1.13%
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth C

AWCA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AWCA and SHMSF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AWCA and SHMSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AWCA
1D Price
Change %
AWCA100%
N/A
SHMSF - AWCA
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HHH - AWCA
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
VGPBF - AWCA
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DOUG - AWCA
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.09%
OMH - AWCA
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
More

VGPBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VGPBF has been loosely correlated with EVGPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VGPBF jumps, then EVGPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VGPBF
1D Price
Change %
VGPBF100%
N/A
EVGPF - VGPBF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GMGSF - VGPBF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
CIGI - VGPBF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
MMI - VGPBF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.63%
HOUS - VGPBF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.88%
More