Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWPAX vs RERCX
AWPAX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts AWPAX vs RERCX
AWPAX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWPAX vs. RERCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWPAX is a Buy and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. AWPAX (639M). RERCX pays higher dividends than AWPAX: RERCX (2.38) vs AWPAX (0.00). AWPAX was incepted earlier than RERCX: AWPAX (32 years) vs RERCX (24 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than AWPAX (1.04). RERCX (50.00) and AWPAX (48.00) have comparable annual turnover. RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWPAX: RERCX (250) vs AWPAX (2500). RERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.80 vs. AWPAX (2.47). RERCX return over 5 years is better than : -6.43 vs. AWPAX (-11.36).
| AWPAX | RERCX | AWPAX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.12 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.12 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.754 | 6.467 | 43% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 639M | 140B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.38 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.47 | 3.80 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.92 | 26.39 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.36 | -6.43 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.60 | 44.13 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers