Compare trend and price AWR vs CDZIP
Loading...
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AWR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCDZIP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AWR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CDZIP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AWR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- AWR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AWR (@Water Utilities) experienced а -3.67% price change this week, while CDZIP (@Water Utilities) price change was -3.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Water Utilities industry was -2.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.04%.
Reported Earning Dates
AWR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Water Utilities (-2.36% weekly)Water utilities operate water treatment plants, and/or distribute water to residential and commercial customers. Companies operating in this industry are largely responsible for the safe and timely distribution of water. While most water systems are local or regional, some of the companies might have operations across several states. The industry is expected to be closely monitored by regulators for quality checks on the water being distributed. Investing in upgrading infrastructure is a major factor in bolstering the supply of clean/safe-to-use water. Given the absolute necessity of water in our lives, the industry is largely non-cyclical. American Water Works Company, Inc., Aqua America, Inc., American States Water Co. and California Water Service Group are some of the major water utilities companies in the U.S.
| AWR | CDZIP | AWR / CDZIP | |
| Capitalization | 2.99B | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | 233M | -23.24M | -1,003% |
| Gain YTD | -13.228 | 18.188 | -73% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.58 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 579M | 2.11M | 27,415% |
| Total Cash | 1.03M | 19.2M | 5% |
| Total Debt | 829M | 59.3M | 1,398% |
AWR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AWR | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% |
AWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AWR has been closely correlated with CWT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AWR jumps, then CWT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AWR | 100% | -1.88% | ||
| CWT - AWR | 89% Closely correlated | -2.57% | ||
| SJW - AWR | 78% Closely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| AWK - AWR | 78% Closely correlated | -2.31% | ||
| WTRG - AWR | 73% Closely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| MSEX - AWR | 72% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||
CDZIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CDZIP and AWR have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDZIP and AWR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDZIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDZIP | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| AWR - CDZIP | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.88% | ||
| SJW - CDZIP | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.70% | ||
| CWT - CDZIP | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.57% | ||
| AWK - CDZIP | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.31% | ||
| WTRG - CDZIP | 3% Poorly correlated | -3.10% | ||
More | ||||