Compare predictions CDZIP vs CWT
Loading...
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDZIP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCWT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CDZIP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CWT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CWT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CWT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CDZIP (@Water Utilities) experienced а -3.44% price change this week, while CWT (@Water Utilities) price change was -3.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Water Utilities industry was -3.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
CWT is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Water Utilities (-3.57% weekly)Water utilities operate water treatment plants, and/or distribute water to residential and commercial customers. Companies operating in this industry are largely responsible for the safe and timely distribution of water. While most water systems are local or regional, some of the companies might have operations across several states. The industry is expected to be closely monitored by regulators for quality checks on the water being distributed. Investing in upgrading infrastructure is a major factor in bolstering the supply of clean/safe-to-use water. Given the absolute necessity of water in our lives, the industry is largely non-cyclical. American Water Works Company, Inc., Aqua America, Inc., American States Water Co. and California Water Service Group are some of the major water utilities companies in the U.S.
| CDZIP | CWT | CDZIP / CWT | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 2.79B | - |
| EBITDA | -23.24M | 232M | -10% |
| Gain YTD | 18.188 | -21.319 | -85% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 41.67 | - |
| Revenue | 2.11M | 792M | 0% |
| Total Cash | 19.2M | 55.6M | 35% |
| Total Debt | 59.3M | 1.18B | 5% |
CWT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CWT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% |
CDZIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CDZIP and AWR have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDZIP and AWR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDZIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDZIP | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| AWR - CDZIP | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.88% | ||
| SJW - CDZIP | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.70% | ||
| CWT - CDZIP | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.57% | ||
| AWK - CDZIP | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.31% | ||
| WTRG - CDZIP | 3% Poorly correlated | -3.10% | ||
More | ||||
CWT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWT has been closely correlated with AWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CWT jumps, then AWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWT | 100% | -2.57% | ||
| AWR - CWT | 89% Closely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| SJW - CWT | 79% Closely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| AWK - CWT | 76% Closely correlated | -2.31% | ||
| MSEX - CWT | 75% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| WTRG - CWT | 75% Closely correlated | -3.10% | ||
More | ||||