Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWTAX vs FRNRX
AWTAX vs FRNRX Comparison
Open Charts AWTAX vs FRNRX
AWTAX vs FRNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWTAX vs. FRNRX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWTAX is a Hold and FRNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AWTAX (494M) and FRNRX (492M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FRNRX pays higher dividends than AWTAX: FRNRX (1.47) vs AWTAX (0.83). AWTAX was incepted earlier than FRNRX: AWTAX (18 years) vs FRNRX (31 years). AWTAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (1.01). AWTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FRNRX (19.72). AWTAX (6%) and FRNRX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FRNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWTAX: FRNRX (1000) vs AWTAX (2500). FRNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.03 vs. AWTAX (-8.09). FRNRX return over 5 years is better than : 127.95 vs. AWTAX (-16.31).
| AWTAX | FRNRX | AWTAX / FRNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.00 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.01 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.369 | 17.273 | 2% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 494M | 492M | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.47 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.09 | 40.03 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.89 | 50.06 | -4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.31 | 127.95 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.77 | 94.59 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement