Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWTAX vs FSDPX
AWTAX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts AWTAX vs FSDPX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Water A
Price$20.82
Change-$0.11 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets548.39M
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$86.41
Change-$0.23 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets680.33M
AWTAX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWTAX vs. FSDPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWTAX is a Hold and FSDPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 680M vs. AWTAX (548M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than AWTAX: FSDPX (0.93) vs AWTAX (0.27). AWTAX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: AWTAX (18 years) vs FSDPX (39 years). AWTAX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. AWTAX (22.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWTAX: FSDPX (0) vs AWTAX (2500). AWTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.70 vs. FSDPX (-12.22). FSDPX return over 5 years is better than : 16.11 vs. AWTAX (11.70).
| AWTAX | FSDPX | AWTAX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.70 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.70 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.694 | 2.820 | 344% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 548M | 680M | 81% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.93 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.70 | -12.22 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.88 | -11.29 | -141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.70 | 16.11 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.14 | 24.18 | 269% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers