Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWTAX vs FSDPX
AWTAX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts AWTAX vs FSDPX
AWTAX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWTAX vs. FSDPX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWTAX is a Hold and FSDPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 785M vs. AWTAX (498M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than AWTAX: FSDPX (1.34) vs AWTAX (0.83). AWTAX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: AWTAX (18 years) vs FSDPX (40 years). AWTAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.69). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. AWTAX (29.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWTAX: FSDPX (0) vs AWTAX (2500). FSDPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.17 vs. AWTAX (-9.34). FSDPX return over 5 years is better than : 5.02 vs. AWTAX (-12.56).
| AWTAX | FSDPX | AWTAX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.69 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.69 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.369 | 6.526 | 6% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 498M | 785M | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.34 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.34 | 7.17 | -130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.24 | 4.91 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.56 | 5.02 | -250% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.04 | 44.65 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement