Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWTCX vs FFGTX
AWTCX vs FFGTX Comparison
Open Charts AWTCX vs FFGTX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Water C
Price$19.91
Change+$0.24 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets573.41M
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$20.56
Change-$0.05 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets895.5M
AWTCX vs FFGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWTCX vs. FFGTX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWTCX is a Hold and FFGTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. AWTCX (573M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than AWTCX: FFGTX (1.67) vs AWTCX (0.00). AWTCX was incepted earlier than FFGTX: AWTCX (17 years) vs FFGTX (16 years). AWTCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. AWTCX (22.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWTCX: FFGTX (0) vs AWTCX (2500). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.22 vs. AWTCX (-2.14). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 97.67 vs. AWTCX (20.06).
| AWTCX | FFGTX | AWTCX / FFGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.40 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.40 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.508 | 14.819 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 573M | 895M | 64% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.67 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.14 | 14.22 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.34 | 15.31 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.06 | 97.67 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.19 | 126.24 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement