AX
Price
$89.02
Change
+$1.41 (+1.61%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.98B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FULT
Price
$22.81
Change
+$0.22 (+0.97%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
4.39B
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AX vs FULT

AX vs FULT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AX vs. FULT commentary
Oct 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AX is a Hold and FULT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AX vs FULT: Fundamental Ratings
AX
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5887
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3637
SMR RATING
1..100
1111
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4837
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (28) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AX (82) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than AX’s over the last 12 months.

AX's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (37) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AX’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

AX's SMR Rating (11) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (11) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AX’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AX (60) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to AX’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AX (48) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to AX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AXFULT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 03, 2026
Stock price -- (AX: $87.61 vs. FULT: $22.59)
Brand notoriety: AX and FULT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AX: 192% vs. FULT: 125%
Market capitalization -- AX: $4.98B vs. FULT: $4.39B
AX [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.98B. FULT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while FULT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than AX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FULT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FULT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the short-term than AX.

Price Growth

AX (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.10% price change this week, while FULT (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

AX is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.68% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
AX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRF10.160.15
+1.48%
Eagle Capital Growth Fund
ARTY79.120.80
+1.02%
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY)
UTWY39.120.13
+0.33%
US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY)
FTMH10.85-0.01
-0.09%
Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH)
TSLT12.55-0.06
-0.48%
T-REX 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT)

AX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AX has been closely correlated with ONB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AX jumps, then ONB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AX
1D Price
Change %
AX100%
+1.20%
ONB - AX
78%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
FULT - AX
77%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
FNB - AX
77%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
ASB - AX
77%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
ABCB - AX
76%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
More

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with ONB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then ONB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
+0.98%
ONB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
ASB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
UBSI - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
AUB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
UCB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+1.26%
More